

TWITTER: @GreenNewsReport
VIA SMART PHONE: Stitcher Radio!
IN TODAY’S RADIO REPORT: It’s WAR!; New rules on fracking to protect drinking water — same old objections from Republicans; The state’s rights versus federal regulations canard; UK: Climate protesters clash with police; Smoke-bomb dropped on French nuke plant; PLUS: Connecting the Dots: Blocking Warren Buffet’s coal trains on 5/5… All that and more in today’s Green News Report!
| Link: | |
| Embed: |
Got comments, tips, love letters, hate mail? Drop us a line at GreenNews@BradBlog.com or right here at the comments link below. All GNRs are always archived at GreenNews.BradBlog.com.
IN ‘GREEN NEWS EXTRA’ (see links below): Environmental group sues to halt killing practices of federal wildlife agency; Court Urged to Order Decision on Nuclear Waste Site; Dept. Of Energy Investigating Harvesting Energy From Methane Hydrates; Pollution from Pavement Sealers?; Rising Coal Exports Have Montana Rail Communities Braced for Worst; AEI& Brookings Must-Read: ‘The Republicans Are The Problem’… PLUS: Plant Study Flags Dangers Of Warming World … and much, MUCH more! …
STORIES DISCUSSED IN TODAY’S ‘GREEN NEWS REPORT’…
- VIDEO: No Higher Power Than Exxon (The Rachel Maddow Show):
- FRACKING: Interior Dept. To Issue New Rules For Frackers:
- Industry official: Interior to release ‘fracking’ rules by Friday (The Hill’s E2 Wire):
The proposal would regulate the oil-and-gas development method known as fracking, in which water, chemicals and sand are injected at high pressure into rock formations to open up seams that enable trapped oil and natural gas to flow.
The rules are expected to include the required disclosure of chemicals used in the hydraulic fracturing process, along with regulations on well integrity and wastewater management.
- Gas industry presses White House on ‘fracking’ rules (The Hill’s E2 Wire)
- VIDEO: Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) Bashes Fracking Regulations (Media Matters)
- Drillers May Frack First, Disclose Later Under Draft Plan (Bloomberg):
Natural-gas companies drilling on U.S. land would be permitted to wait until after hydraulic fracturing is completed to disclose what chemicals they used, under a draft rule being considered by the Interior Department.
- Fracking Sand Threatens Gas Well Workers, Researcher Says (BusinessWeek):
Sand dust created from the hydraulic fracturing to extract natural gas from rock is one of the most dangerous threats to workers at wells blossoming across the U.S., a government safety researcher said.
- CO: House Field Hearing On Federal Fracking Regulations:
- Fracking the Focus of Congressional Hearing at Colorado Capitol [Updated] (KUNC, Univ. of Northern Colorado)
- Congressional hearing in Denver tackles fracking (AP) [emphasis added]:
“Do Coloradans react differently to water pollution?” asked a skeptical Rep. Rush Holt, a New Jersey Democrat who attended the field hearing and questioned the state officials who argued against national safety regulation. After Clarke testified that Utah saw no water contamination in 50 years, Holt said that perhaps that was because the state wasn’t looking.
…
The question of who sets drilling rules is especially prickly in Colorado. Later in the day, many of the witnesses who appeared before the congressional panel testified at a state legislative panel where the chairman has proposed punishing local governments that seek to rein in drilling. - Independent Analysis Confirms That Hydraulic Fracturing Caused Drinking Water Contamination In Wyoming (Climate Progress):
In December 2011, the Environmental Protection Agency found official evidence that poisonous chemicals from fracking had contaminated water near drill rigs in Pavillion, Wyoming. That study has now been backed up by an independent expert. ,
- Fracking dominates the debate at Capitol: Federal vs. state oversight focus of hearing in Denver (Durango Herald)
- Congressional subcommittee urged not to duplicate state frac regulations (Oil & Gas Journal)
- Fracking Fluid Can Migrate Into Aquifers: Study
- New Study Predicts Frack Fluids Can Migrate to Aquifers Within Years (Pro Publica):
A new study has raised fresh concerns about the safety of gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale, concluding that fracking chemicals injected into the ground could migrate toward drinking water supplies far more quickly than experts have previously predicted.
- UK: Climate Activists Clash With UK Police at Big 6 Energy Summit:
- VIDEO: Police and protesters clash at energy summit – video (Guardian UK):
Environmental protesters from the Climate Justice Collective attempt to force their way into the UK Energy Summit taking place in London. Police were injured and protesters claim two people were knocked unconscious after being hit on the head by batons in the clashes near St Paul’s
- Energy conference protesters accuse police of heavy-handed tactics: Protesters say ‘wildly disproportionate’ response at Big Six Energy Bash led to injuries among participants (Guardian UK)
- Two arrested as protesters target energy conference: Two people have been arrested as protesters tried to break their way into a five-star hotel where an energy industry summit was taking place. (Telegraph UK)
- France: Greenpeace ‘Smoke-Bombs’ French Nuke Plant:
- VIDEO: French activist drops a smoke bomb on nuclear plant (CBS News)
- Aerial Greenpeace protester strikes at French nuclear site, dropping smoke bomb on reactor (AP)
- CANADA: Hansen To Block Buffet’s Coal Trains:
- Climate Activists Tell Warren Buffett Why They Are Blocking His Coal Trains, Via James Hansen (Climate Progress)
- Protest Against Northwest Coal Export (Earth Justice)
- Fighting coal export terminals: It matters (Grist):
Moral of the story: The health of the U.S. coal industry hinges on its ability to increase exports to China and India.
- Coal business update: ‘Severe weakness’ cited in U.S. markets (Coal Tattoo)
- Coal’s Future Is Rocky at Best (BusinessWeek):
Coal is in a struggle with a perfect adversary: ultracheap natural gas.
- VIDEO: James Hansen: Why I must speak out about climate change (TED Talks):
Top climate scientist James Hansen tells the story of his involvement in the science of and debate over global climate change. In doing so he outlines the overwhelming evidence that change is happening and why that makes him deeply worried about the future.
- 5/5/2012: CONNECT THE DOTS International Day of Climate Action:: TAKE ACTION
‘GREEN NEWS EXTRA’ (Stuff we didn’t have time for in today’s audio report)…
- EXCLUSIVE: Environmental group sues to halt killing practices of federal wildlife agency (Sacramento Bee):
The federal government’s wildlife damage control program is based on outdated science and indiscriminate tools that kill many non-target animals, including protected species, according to a lawsuit filed Monday by WildEarth Guardians, a Colorado-based environmental group.
- YUCCA MTN: Court Urged to Order Decision on Nuclear Waste Site (NY Times):
Two states with large amounts of military and civilian nuclear waste told a federal court panel on Wednesday that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission was flouting the law by declining to decide whether the Nevada desert is a suitable burial spot – even if the Obama administration says the storage plan is dead.
- Dept. Of Energy Invesgating Harvesting Energy From Methane Hydrates: (Reuters):
The Energy Department on Wednesday announced a breakthrough in research into tapping a possibly vast fuel resource that could eventually bolster already massive natural gas reserves.
- Lights Out for Research Satellites? (NY Times):
Earth-observing systems operated by the United States have entered a steep decline, imperiling the nation’s monitoring of weather, natural disasters and climate change, a report from the National Research Council warned on Wednesday.
- Studies Raise Questions About Pavement Sealers (Environmental Health News):
Airborne emissions and stray dust from coal tar–based sealers, one of the two main types of products used to coat certain asphalt pavements, may be a more significant human health threat than previously thought, according to three new studies and a review published by U.S. government and university researchers.
- EPA Moves To Regulate Logging-Road Runoff as Supreme Court Eyes Case (Greenwire):
At issue, EPA said, is a controversial 2010 ruling by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that tossed out the agency’s 35-year-old policy of allowing loggers to use best management practices instead of pollution-discharge permits. Trying to soothe its critics, EPA said in a statement that it is considering “flexible” options — including some that would require no permit — in recognition of some land-management practices in use to minimize the water pollution from forest roads.
- Midwest Generation To Close 2 Chicago Coal Plants Early (Chicago Tribune):
Chicago is the only major U.S. city with coal plants operating within its borders. For years, environmental and community groups have blamed Fisk and Crawford for high asthma rates and other health problems in their predominantly Latino, low-income neighborhoods. A 2010 report by the National Research Council estimated that pollution from the coal plants costs surrounding areas $127 million a year in hidden health costs.
- Rising Coal Exports Have Montana Rail Communities Braced for Worst (Daily Climate)
- American Enterprise Institute And Brookings Must-Read: ‘The Republicans Are The Problem’ (Climate Progress):
Two leading political scholars – representing the conservative American Enterprise Institute and the centrist Brookings Institution – have published a must-read article, “Let’s just say it: The Republicans are the problem.”
- Plant Study Flags Dangers Of Warming World (Reuters):
“Increased carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere from burning fossil fuels can affect how plants produce oxygen, while higher temperatures and variable rainfall patterns can change their behavior.
- Well, MEOW: VIDEO: T. Boone Pickens: ‘The Biggest Deterrent To An Energy Plan In America Is Koch Industries’ (Climate Progress):
The biggest deterrent to an energy plan in America is Koch Industries,†the BP Capital founder tells Yahoo’s Aaron Task. “They do not want an energy plan for America because they have the cheapest natural gas price they’ve ever had, and they’re in the fertilizer business and they’re in the chemical business. So their margins are huge. And they do not want you to have an energy plan, because if you had a plan, then natural gas prices would come up.
- US solar subsidies consistent with coal, oil: report (Reuters):
U.S. government support for solar energy is no different from its support for traditional energy sources, despite critics’ complaints that the renewable energy source has gotten special incentives, a new solar-industry backed report found.
- Analysis: Dow’s new GMO corn: “time bomb” or farmers’ dream? (Reuters):
Opponents include some specialty crop farmers who fear 2,4-D herbicide use could cause widespread damage to crops that are not engineered with a tolerance to it. It is so potent that its use is tightly restricted in some areas and at certain times of the year in some U.S. states.
- Nuclear Safety Advocates Accuse Industry And Regulators Of Foot-Dragging On Basic Safety Measures (Huffington Post Green):
[W]hat if the Pilgrim plant experienced a meltdown like the one that unfolded just over a year ago in Fukushima, Japan?
“I live just six miles from that plant across open water,” says Lampert, a staunch advocate for tougher oversight of the nuclear power industry. “It always comes down to public safety versus the cost to industry of implementing something.”
- Climate Change Has Intensified the Global Water Cycle (Climate Central):
Based on measurements gathered around the world from 1950-2000, a team of researchers from Australia and the U.S. has concluded that the hydrologic cycle is indeed changing. Wet areas are getting wetter and dry areas are getting drier. But it’s happening about twice as fast as anyone thought, and that could mean big trouble for places like Australia, which has already been experiencing crushing drought in recent years.
- Skeptical Science: Get the FULL DEBUNKING of ALL Climate Science Denier Arguments
- VIDEO: James Hansen: Why I must speak out about climate change (TED Talks):
Top climate scientist James Hansen tells the story of his involvement in the science of and debate over global climate change. In doing so he outlines the overwhelming evidence that change is happening and why that makes him deeply worried about the future.
- VIDEO ANIMATION: Time history of atmospheric CO2 (NOAA Carbon Tracker YouTube channel):
- VIDEO: Animation Charts Modern Global Warming (NYT Green)
- Must-Read: Economist William Nordhaus Slams Global Warming Deniers, Explains Cost of Delay is $4 Trillion (Climate Progress):
Nordhaus’s blunt piece – “Why the Global Warming Skeptics Are Wrong” – is worth reading because he is no climate hawk.
…
“The skeptics’ summary is based on poor analysis and on an incorrect reading of the results.” - Part 1: The brutal logic of climate change (David Roberts, Grist) [emphasis added]:
It’s simple: If there is to be any hope of avoiding civilization-threatening climate disruption, the U.S. and other nations must act immediately and aggressively on an unprecedented scale. That means moving to emergency footing. War footing. “Hitler is on the march and our survival is at stake” footing. That simply won’t be possible unless a critical mass of people are on board. It’s not the kind of thing you can sneak in incrementally.
It is unpleasant to talk like this. People don’t want to hear it.
- Part 2: The brutal logic of climate change mitigation (David Roberts, Grist)
- How to Buy Time in the Fight against Climate Change: Mobilize to Stop Soot and Methane: A short list of relatively simple actions taken to reduce greenhouse gases other than CO2 could help put the brakes on global warming–if implemented globally (Scientific American)
- Climate Scientists Rebuke Rupert Murdoch: WSJ Denier Op-Ed Like ‘Dentists Practicing Cardiology’ (Think Progress Green)
- Saudi Oil Minister Calls Global Warming “Humanity’s Most Pressing Concern” (Climate Progress):
“We know that pumping oil out of the ground does not create many jobs. It does not foster an entrepreneurial spirit, nor does it sharpen critical faculties.”- VIDEO: Behold: The World’s First 24/7 Solar Plant is Up and Running (Treehugger)
- World headed for irreversible climate change in five years, IEA warns: If fossil fuel infrastructure is not rapidly changed, the world will ‘lose for ever’ the chance to avoid dangerous climate change (Guardian UK) [emphasis added]:
The world is likely to build so many fossil-fuelled power stations, energy-guzzling factories and inefficient buildings in the next five years that it will become impossible to hold global warming to safe levels, and the last chance of combating dangerous climate change will be “lost for ever”, according to the most thorough analysis yet of world energy infrastructure.
…
“The door is closing,” Fatih Birol, chief economist at the International Energy Agency, said. “I am very worried – if we don’t change direction now on how we use energy, we will end up beyond what scientists tell us is the minimum [for safety]. The door will be closed forever.”- Concise Overview: The IPCC report on extreme climate and weather events (Real Climate)
- READ the IPCC Report: Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)
- The Real Global Warming Signal (Tamino)
- No, global warming hasn’t stopped (New Scientist)
- Top UN Climate Official Blasts U.S. Climate Policy: Americans Must Realize “This Is Their Future They’re Compromising” (Think Progress Green)
- VIDEO: Climate Scientists Michael Mann on “A Look Into Our Climate: Past To Present To Future” (TEDx, YouTube)
- Earth’s Plant Growth Fell Because of Climate Change, Study Finds (NYT Green)
- Heads in the Sand: Warning: “Climate change is occurring … and poses significant risks to humans and the environment,” reports the National Academy of Sciences. As climate-change science moves in one direction, Republicans in Congress are moving in another. Why?
(National Journal) [emphasis added]:Tim Phillips, president of Americans for Prosperity, says there’s no question that the influence of his group and others like it has been instrumental in the rise of Republican candidates who question or deny climate science. “If you look at where the situation was three years ago and where it is today, there’s been a dramatic turnaround. Most of these candidates have figured out that the science has become political,” he said.
…
Groups like Americans for Prosperity have done it.“
























I noticed that you watched that Rachel Maddow episode too.
The part about The Private Empire was astounding, in the sense that ExxonMobile determines energy policy.
The oil and gas industry’s own data reports that out of all new wells drilled, about 6% of them lose well integrity (the well fails) immediately.
Dr Anthony Ingraffea, of Cornel U dug into the industry’s numbers and found that after 30 years time, 60% (YES..SIXTY) of all all oil and gas wells drilled will fail.
A Duke University study published a couple years back confirmed that when new drilling takes place in proximity to existing wells, there will always be an increased chance of migration into the aquifer and environment.
A Carnegie Mellon Study cited Cabot Oil and Gas’ own numbers which placed the cost to plug the 3 suspect wells (which are vertical wells, no long laterals) in Dimock, PA in excess of $700,000 per well.
The state of PA Alone has between 300,000 and 500,00 existing oil and gas wells. The reason for the wide variance is that, since 1859, when the Drake well was first drilled in Oil City, PA, thousands of wells were drilled with no records kept for them. of the one’s PA has some kind of record on, at least 180,000 are lost and or abandoned without being plugged or plugged improperly.
This is an ecological disaster in PA, unfolding in slow motion, that will eclipse the superfund cleanup of PA’s coal mine acid drainage issue. This could wind up costing well into the $BILLIONS
A short (20 minute) presentation on PA’s lost and abandoned wells:
http://youtu.be/OV3GSdTuyhw
Anyone see this:
http://www.opednews.com/populum/linkframe.php?linkid=149876
There are four continental tectoninic plates pushing in on Japan. It is not a matter of if, but when the next quake happens and Tepco doesn’t have enough money to deal with the situation. They don’t want their stock prices to drop; tough shit when the entire world gets covered in long-lived radioactivity 10 times greater than Chernobyl.
I challenge all you greens right now. You say go green, but what of the COSTS!?
I been going green myself, and I think it’s insane you people are promoting this green stuff and ARE NOT DOING IT YOURSELVES.
If you were, you would be advertising deep cell batteries, used solar panels, mounts, copper wire, or illegal imported electric hubs for bikes, 3 wheel electric, 4 wheel electric bikes. and a lot of stuff like this. But no, all we hear is bla bla bla how many years now?
Show us your green Mr Brad.
How green is your home? (do you own your land?)
Do you have a smartmeter (sic)?
How green is your transportation? (ALL OF IT)
How green is your communications?
How green is your computers, Websites, and ISP?
How clean is your food from GMO’s, Radiation, Floride?
You don’t seem to grasp financial reality here. I’m saying get your ass off the grid and lets hear your tale.
Otherwise you BRAD, really don’t know what your talking about.
DISCONTINUED: We no longer carry the Gomier electric trike.
At this time we do not import the eZee Carro into the US.
I can go ON and ON and ON with vaporware BS solar parts equally unavailable.
Man up, Show it up, show you are more green than me. Hack something. Go get a 45watt harbor freight panel, and hack it into a Rhoades Car. Put up or shut up. You aren’t green.
YOU ARE BLINDLY PUSHING THIS EXPENSIVE INSANITY ON PEOPLE. You can’t even pull the ripple out of a dirty DC I bet.
Make free or very low cost transportation 100% turnkey.
Think beyond Car Plus Plug. Power that PLUG. or shut up.
Thanks for your comment, “GoinGreene”, but clearly you aren’t familiar with our work here. We report on scientific evidence, politics, and policies dealing with the environment, energy, and the disruptive impacts of human activities, plus occasionally research, development and innovations in clean energy. We do not promote products.
Perhaps you’re actually “going green” as you claim. But you seem to have a limited understanding of both the science underlying climate change and the economics of shifting to a sustainable path, at the personal, local, state, national and global level.
But your comments do have the whiff of doing the fossil fuel companies’ dirty work for them, telling people to shut up until they have met your personal conditions. We don’t work that way.
GoinGreenie @ 4:
I see Des already responded to your latest silly rant, but I’ll toss in one more thought nonetheless…
How many years now? I think we’ve been doing the Green News Report for a bit over there years now. Thanks for asking!
But, to your point, we’d be delighted to welcome the folks who sell the stuff you mention above as sponsors here! Please ask them to feel free to get in touch with me, or they can just go ahead and create their own advertisements here at The BRAD BLOG without my intervention at all by using this link.
Not sure where you got the idea I get to pick and choose who advertises here. But, as mentioned, we would be thrilled to welcome all of those advertisers you mention! So thanks in advance for sending them our way!
Are You incapable of dealing with reality, or my challenge? You want me to enter businesses who sell green into your database which doesn’t even exist. You are the one who is supposed to be GREEN. Show us what you yourself are doing. Do you even have a solar bike? Give me a break!
I just found a nice post that describes exactly what people visiting bradblog should do until you put up or shut up.
YOU DO THE WORK, YOU START THE GREEN ADS. I ain’t promoting green, I am trying to make it work in a world of lies and bullshit. I am ONLY trying to find a way to make it actually work financially for real people who aren’t banksters.
It doesn’t WORK as advertised, anyone getting into this is going to have nasty hoops to jump through. So what the fuck?
Turning off the TV is the best way to save power
http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/05/turning-off-the-tv-is-the-best-way-to-save-power/
The numbers in that study to me are a god damn joke. IF you are using that low of watts GOD BLESS YOU FUCKIN LIAR.
Here’s a new GOAL.
#1 OUTLAW ALL UN TREATIES AND AGENDA
#2 Every home’s new goal is to generate 50 MEGA WATTS.
Homeowners associations, Drivers, Roads, Commerce all their fucking laws MUST BE nullified to make it happen, otherwise you are blowing smoke out of your pharts.
#3 The Smart meters (and associated RF noise, interference, mind control and other BS..) go the way of the DODO BIRD and
#4 any grid tie is OPTIONAL not MANDATORY.
GoinGreenie – I want to like Bradblog, but right now I hate their fucking guts.
GoinGreenie –
Just a thought, but you may wanna lay off the Red Bull for a bit before you snap a blood vessel in your brain. It generally doesn’t help an argument when one appears to be either manic or completely insane, as you may recognize if you re-read your comment above once the Red Bull has worn off.
For the record, as Des has explained to you previously, we are journalists. We report. What we do or do not do in our personal lives has nothing, in particular, to do with our work to that end. So, frankly, I’m not even sure what you claim we are “supposed to be” doing, as you suggest. I’m fairly sure, in any case, neither of us have any responsibility to you, other than to report the truth as best as we can. For the price you are paying for that reporting, I’m pretty sure you are getting a bargain! You’re welcome!
As to the ads we sell on The BRAD BLOG, you may recall in a previous comment you complained that we should feature ads by green companies. I said we’d be delighted to have those companies advertise here if they wish, and gave you the link to where such companies can purchase ads immediately here. But you’re still angry about something?! Really?
No clue what. But I’ll just hope it’s the Red Bull talking.
GoinGreenie — your comments are an interesting sort of ‘purity trolling’, and a rather good example of why some so-called ‘green’ advocates have earned a reputation for being intolerant and intolerable.
Your aggressive insistence that all must adhere to your personal standards of purity or else STFU forever is a rather contradictory approach to ‘going green’, as you claim is your goal. Perhaps that is by design. Apparently your experiences with ‘going green’ have been negative — that can happen with any new technology, as it did in the early days of computers and cell phones, for example — but your experiences are not in line with most polls that indicate most people are satisfied with their attempts to make ‘greener’ consumer choices.
There is far, far more to the vast scope of energy, environment and climate sectors and related implications than your narrow focus on consumer products and consumption would indicate. The reporting we do here focuses primarily on the energy, environment, and climate news routinely ignored in the corporate media. That is our beat. Many blogs cover ‘green’ consumer options. You might consider commenting there, or starting your own blog to relate your experiences in that area.