Ethically-Challenged Justices Feted By Healthcare Law Challengers

Oligarchic perversion of our legal system continues apace...

Share article:

Guest blogged by Ernest A. Canning

In light of GOP Presidential front-runner Newt Gingrich’s recently revitalized attacks on the judiciary as, apparently, not yet extreme or activist enough for his tastes — though he finds, like most of the other GOP candidates, Justices Roberts, Scalia, Thomas and Alito to be “pretty darn good” — it’s worth taking note of just some of the recent behavior, judicial temperament and fundamental principles of those far-Right extremist Supreme Court Justices he apparently does approve of.

To that end, the opening paragraph of a Nov. 14 Los Angeles Times article was disturbing but not surprising:

The day the Supreme Court gathered behind closed doors to consider the politically divisive question of whether it would hear a challenge to President Obama’s healthcare law, two of its justices, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, were feted at a dinner sponsored by the law firm that will argue the case before the high court.

While basic canons of judicial ethics suggest that judges should avoid even the appearance of impropriety, it remains exceedingly doubtful that the gathering of signatures on a Credo Action Petition will prompt either of these two “radicals in robes” to recuse themselves…

Federalist Society perversion of the judiciary

While many now flocking to Occupy Wall Street focus on the pernicious impact of a gaping wealth disparity and the near total domination of our executive and legislative branches of government by corporate wealth, too few have come to appreciate how court-packing by the ultra-radical, right-wing Federalist Society has undermined the rule of law.

“By the end of 2005,” John Dean observed in Conservatives without Conscience, “‘about 60 percent of the federal appeals courts were appointed by Republican presidents,’ and of ‘the 13 circuit courts of appeal, 9 have majorities of judges by Republican presidents.'”

In an August 2001 report, “The Federalist Society: From Obscurity to Power,” the People for the American Way documented how the Federalist Society, founded by Robert Bork and funded by right-wing billionaires — “the John M. Olin, Lynde and Harry Bradley, Sarah Scaife, and Charles G. Koch foundations” — became a clearinghouse for judicial appointments under GOP regimes. (The GOP tactic under the Clinton and Obama administrations has been to turn the confirmation process into a bottle neck so as to assure vacancies during GOP administrations.)

Four of the nine Justices now sitting on the U.S. Supreme Court — Associate Justices Scalia, Thomas & Samuel Alito along with the Chief Justice John Roberts — are affiliated with the Federalist Society, though the Bush administration took pains to conceal the Chief Justice’s affiliation during his confirmation hearings.

It is an affiliation that prompted Jim Hightower to describe the four as “a Corporatist Supreme Court Cabal,” in which both Scalia and Thomas have regularly attended the Koch brothers’ plutocratic political functions and in which these radicals-in-robes have done the hard-right’s bidding through such democracy-destroying decisions as Citizens United — the case which will live in infamy and the judicial coup that was Bush v. Gore.

Above the rule of law

In its coverage of Scalia and Thomas being feted at a dinner sponsored by pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Inc. and a law firm which will argue against the constitutionality of President Obama’s healthcare law, Los Angeles Times brushes aside the appalling lack of propriety by noting that these two miscreants “have been attending Federalist Society events for years,” and, besides, Supreme Court Justices “are exempt from the code of Conduct that governs the actions of lower court judges.”

While that standard makes a mockery of the words which appear above the portico to the U.S. Supreme Court — “Equal Justice Under Law” — it squares with Law Professor Paul Campos’ observation that it “is very unlikely [that Thomas would] be prosecuted or otherwise sanctioned for the simple reason that, in the United States in 2011, we have a two-tiered system of laws” where, for the vast majority of citizens, “an unusually harsh criminal code” has given rise to “by far the biggest prison population in the world.” Nonetheless, he added, “our political and financial elites operate with something approaching complete impunity.”

We were warned

A salient but much overlooked fact is that the Federalist Society was founded in 1982 by Judge Robert Bork.

For many Americans Bork first became a household name during an event known as “the Saturday night massacre.”

At the height of the Watergate scandal, a Democratic-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee insisted that Nixon’s choice for Attorney General, Elliot Richardson, agree to name a special prosecutor to investigate issues pertaining to Watergate. Richardson appointed Archibald Cox, a former U.S. Solicitor General. Cox’s aim was true. He went after the tapes of Oval Office conversations — the very tapes that ultimately led to the “smoking gun” revelations that supported Articles of Impeachment and culminated in Nixon’s resignation.

When Nixon tried to stonewall, Cox obtained a federal court order for their release. Nixon ordered Cox to stop pursuing the tapes. Cox not only refused but told Nixon he would seek a court order holding him in contempt. In succession, Attorney General Richardson and Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus chose honor over personal loyalty, resigning rather than carrying out the order to fire Cox. Nixon then turned to Solicitor General Robert Bork, who apparently had no ethical qualms about sacking Cox.

Bork’s and the Federalist Society’s reactionary goals were best summarized by Senator Edward (“Ted”) Kennedy’s remarks during the floor debate over Bork’s unsuccessful 1987 nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court by President Ronald Reagan:

This debate has been a timely lesson in this bicentennial year of the Constitution of our commitment to the rule of law, to the principle of equal justice for all Americans and to the fundamental role of the Supreme Court in protecting the basic rights of every citizen. In choosing Robert Bork, President Reagan has selected a nominee who is unique in fulminating opposition to fundamental constitutional principles as they are broadly understood in our society. He has expressed opposition time and again, in a long line of attacks on landmark Supreme Court decisions protecting civil rights, the rights of women, the right to privacy and other individual rights and liberties. Judge Bork may be President Reagan’s ideal ideological choice…but that choice is not acceptable to Congress and the country, and it is not acceptable in a Justice of the nation’s highest court.

Unfortunately, Bork’s views are not unique. They are the views held by the Federalist Society-funding billionaire oligarchs, like the Koch brothers, who would mask their authoritarian corporate capitalism under an Orwellian concept of “liberty” as the two-tiered system of “justice” entailing elite impunity is assured by a “bought-and-paid-for” judiciary.

* * *

Ernest A. Canning has been an active member of the California state bar since 1977. Mr. Canning has received both undergraduate and graduate degrees in political science as well as a juris doctor. He is also a Vietnam vet (4th Infantry, Central Highlands 1968). Follow him on Twitter: @Cann4ing.

Reader Comments on

Ethically-Challenged Justices Feted By Healthcare Law Challengers

7 Comments

(Comments are now closed.)


7 Responses

  1. 1)
    curlew said on 12/18/2011 @ 9:16am PT: [Permalink]

    In Justice Thomas’ case, we know with certainty that he violated the law with his annual filings going back for years, which were without question false. His defense in the unlikely event of a prosecution would be that he misunderstood the requirements, and thus had no intent and could not be found guilty.

    I’m not sure any of the others have a pattern of violating law, but there is no doubt that they lack intellectual honesty, which one would think is a fundamental requirement to serve on any court, much less our highest.

    I would love to be able to put Scalia on the spot and question his “strict constructionist” legal philosophy on some questions which would be difficult for him to answer. In particular, since he has publicly stated that the meaning of the 14th amendment depends on what certain words were assumed to mean when they were written, someone needs to ask him what “arms” meant in the second amendment when it was written. Does he think that arms meant breech loading automatic weapons, which had not yet even been invented? Presumably arms did mean swords and muzzle loading weapons, so I should be able to wear a sword without restriction, yet bans on swords or large knives or crossbows don’t seem to be a constitutional issue.

  2. 3)
    Dredd said on 12/18/2011 @ 10:52am PT: [Permalink]

    The radicals in robes link goes to a book written by Cass Sunstein who has said:

    What can government do about conspiracy theories? Among the things it can do, what should it do? We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories. (3) Government might itself engage in counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories. (4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counterspeech. (5) Government might engage in informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help. Each instrument has a distinctive set of potential effects, or costs and benefits, and each will have a place under imaginable conditions. However, our main policy idea is that government should engage in cognitive infiltration of the groups that produce conspiracy theories, which involves a mix of (3), (4) and (5).

    (The Empire Strikes Back, quoting Sunstein). That fascist ideology by Sunstein doesn’t take away from your premise, but there are some studies that show the federal judiciary is more right wing than at any time since the Depression.

    Those would be better sources for bloggers to read than Sunstein.

  3. 4)
    Caleb said on 12/18/2011 @ 11:58pm PT: [Permalink]

    And Sunstein is considered one of the LIBERAL members of the University of Chicago’s Law School faculty!

  4. 7)
    CambridgeKnitter said on 12/19/2011 @ 6:55pm PT: [Permalink]

    Actually, Professor Sunstein moved from the University of Chicago Law School to my alma mater, Harvard Law School. He is currently Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the Office of Management and Budget.

(Comments are now closed.)


Please help The BRAD BLOG, BradCast and Green News Report remain independent and 100% reader and listener supported in our 23rd YEAR!!!

ONE TIME
any amount...

MONTHLY
any amount...

OR VIA SNAIL MAIL
Make check out to...
Brad Friedman/
BRAD BLOG
7095 Hollywood Blvd., #594
Los Angeles, CA 90028

RECENT POSTS

But Here’s Another Post That Comes AFTER the Stay-on-Top Test!

But is it really under the sticky post?

Trying Out Stay-on-Top Functionality

How does it work?

You tell me!

‘Dangerous Times’: Climate Scientist Warns Trump ‘Censorship’ Endangering National Security: ‘BradCast’ 3/6/2026

Guest: Dr. Peter Gleick; Also: Admin deported at least 50 legal Venezuelan migrants; Judge says South Sudan deportations violated court order

This is the Sub Sub title line. Have added it so that we can see how the spacing works everywhere with both sub headers...

TEST

Guest: Election expert Marilyn Marks on GA 2018 Lt. Gov. election contest as state moves to unverifiable barcoded ballots; Also: FL 2020 GOP power-grab update; IA Repubs vote to NOT count absentee ballots...

Investigators reportedly examining federal judge's long history of alleged domestic abuse, while Congressional impeachment looms...

The Attempted 2018 Voter Suppression Begins: ‘BradCast’ 8/20/2018

And other news, both good and bad, around the country and world, 78 days out from the midterm elections...

A New Test Post for Linux61

This is one of those famous sub-titles you've heard so much about, that have been so vexing

And this, believe it or not, is a sub-sub-title!...

Sunday ‘Cutting Corners’ Toons

THIS WEEK: Big Barbaric Bill ... Conman's Clowns ... Anti-Semitism ... In Memoriam ...

‘A World of Tyrants, Bribes, and Influence’: ‘BradCast’ 5/22/2025

Guests: Heather Digby Parton of Salon, 'Driftglass' of 'Pro Left Podcast'...

‘Green News Report’ – May 22, 2025

With Brad Friedman & Desi Doyen...

And Then They Came for Members of Congress…: ‘BradCast’ 5/20/2025

Guest: Attorney Keith Barber; Also: Noem doesn't know what Habeas Corpus means; Paramount owner wants CBS News to roll over to Trump...

‘Green News Report’ – May 20, 2025

With Brad Friedman & Desi Doyen...

Appeals Court Blocks Last Route for Voters to Challenge Violations of the Voting Rights Act: ‘BradCast’ 5/19/2025

Guest: Justin Levitt, former Dep. Asst. A.G. at DOJ; Also: Springsteen sounds alarm; Far-right loses in Romania; SCOTUS blocks Trump again...

Sunday ‘Now Hoarding’ Toons

THIS WEEK: From the Middle East ... to Capitol Hill ... and Across the MAGAVerse ...

Mad World: ‘BradCast’ 5/15/2025

Birthright citizenship and nationwide injunctions at SCOTUS; GOP tax and health care cuts in the House; Eliminating FEMA, dismantling NWS before hurricane season; Noem's surreal tattoo testimony; Souter's warning...

‘Green News Report’ – May 15, 2025

With Brad Friedman & Desi Doyen...

About Brad Friedman...

Brad is an independent investigative journalist, blogger and broadcaster.
Full Bio & Testimonials…
Media Appearance Archive…
Articles & Editorials Elsewhere…
Contact…
He has contributed chapters to these books…
…And is featured in these documentary films…

BRAD BLOG ON THE AIR!

THE BRADCAST on KPFK/Pacifica Radio Network (90.7FM Los Angeles, 98.7FM Santa Barbara, 93.7FM N. San Diego and nationally on many other affiliate stations! ALSO VIA PODCAST: RSS/XML feed | Pandora | TuneInApple Podcasts/iTunesiHeartAmazon Music

GREEN NEWS REPORT, nationally syndicated, with new episodes on Tuesday and Thursday. ALSO VIA PODCAST: RSS/XML feed | Pandora | TuneInApple Podcasts/iTunesiHeartAmazon Music

Media Appearance Archives…

AD
CONTENT

ADDITIONAL STUFF

Brad Friedman/
The BRAD BLOG Named...

Buzz Flash's 'Wings of Justice' Honoree
Project Censored 2010 Award Recipient
The 2008 Weblog Awards