Last night, MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow led off with the story we covered on Monday concerning Mitt Romney’s apparent voter fraud in the state of Massachusetts.
Her piece includes an interview with GOP Presidential candidate Fred Karger, the man investigated the case and who filed an official complaint against Romney in the Bay State on Monday…
Maddow’s excellent report does not, however, delve into the recent and growing spate of high-profile GOPers who have, or appear to have committed similar felony voter fraud violations — such as Romney’s potential fellow Mormon GOP Presidential hopeful Gov. Jon Huntsman, Missouri’s GOP U.S. Senate candidate Rep. Todd Akin, Indiana’s Republican Sec. of State Charlie White (who is currently facing 3 voter fraud-related indictments), or GOP voter fraud queen Ann Coulter.
Neither does she take the opportunity of noting the hypocrisy of Romney’s (and the others) apparent voter fraud, when taken side-by-side with the current Republican jihad in state after state across the country to impose disenfranchising polling place voter suppression measures.
Our Monday story on Romney’s apparent voter fraud, should you be interested, covers all of the above.
What Rachel Maddow left out, other GOPers who appear to have committed voter fraud and R-controlled state legislatures passing more polling place voter suppression laws, while Bradblog included, should be one of the first examples of corporate ownership influence on news reporting. Comcast, a Republican-leaning corporation that refused a Peace Action anti war ad in 2002 and sued Montgomery County, MD county councilmembers George Leventhal and Thomas Perez after they tried to get a worker rehired (fired for trying to organize a union), is again showing it’s red color in limiting Rachel Maddow from including the context around the Romney alleged vote fraud story that Bradblog included.
Liberals fear that Romney will be able to make a strong case against re-electing President Obama!