Guest blogged by Chris Floyd
Below is an expanded version of my column in today’s edition of The Moscow Times.
Four years ago, George W. Bush quietly assumed dictatorial powers with a secret executive order granting himself the right to imprison anyone on earth indefinitely, without charges or trial or indictment or evidence, simply by declaring them an “enemy combatant,” on his say-so alone. This week, the assemblage of bootlickers and bagmen that now befoul the U.S. Senate voted to codify the core of this global autocracy under the pretense of curtailing it.
With great self-fluffing fanfare, the Senate passed two measures ostensibly designed to stem the flood of torture and tyranny issuing from the White House. But the twinned amendments to a military spending bill have the curious effect of cancelling each other out: the anti-torture measure leaves Bush’s tyranny intact, while the anti-tyranny measure will allow torture to continue unabated. This switcheroo, we are told by one of the scam’s sponsors, “will reestablish moral high ground for the United States,” the Washington Post reports.
But what can we actually see from this lofty moral promontory? We see that all foreign captives in Bush’s worldwide gulag have now been stripped of the ancient human right of habeas corpus. They will not be allowed to challenge “any aspect of their detention” in court — until they have already been tried and convicted by a “military tribunal” constituted under rules concocted arbitrarily by Bush and his minions. Only then, after years of incarceration without rights or legal protection, will they be given access to a single federal appeals court which can review their conviction — subject to the usual “national security” restrictions on challenging evidence gathered by secret means from secret sources in secret places. Remarkably, the Supreme Court is expressly prohibited from any jurisdiction whatsoever over any aspect of gulag captivity, the Washington Post reports. And of course, Bush can simply skip the tribunal and keep anyone he pleases chained in legal limbo until they rot. Neither of the ballyhooed amendments affects this raw despotism.
Meanwhile, American citizens can also be arbitrarily imprisoned indefinitely without charge or trial. But for now, any Homelanders caught in Bush’s Terror War net can at least appear briefly in court prior to their conviction, where they will enjoy a “judicial process” that Stalin or Saddam would have loved: Bush officials present the judge with a piece of paper declaring that the prisoner is one bad hombre, but all the evidence against him is classified and nobody can see it — especially the prisoner, the Washington Post reports. And that’s it. The captive is then plunged back into the gulag, to be disposed of according to Bush’s whim. Again, this medieval mechanism of tyranny was left untouched by the Senate actions.
The Senate originally voted to cast Bush’s captives into outer darkness forever, without a single legal recourse. But then a few prissy hens and bleeding hearts made the usual squawk about rights and law and all that pinko jazz. So the compromise of allowing a post-conviction appeal — for people who have been arbitrarily seized and held in isolation for years without charges, often tortured, humiliated and driven to madness or attempted suicide before facing a kangaroo court — was hastily cobbled together and presented to the world as a triumph of the human spirit and the American way.
Ah, but what about the anti-torture amendment, sponsored by the Republican “maverick,” Senator John McCain, and hailed by editorialists across the land as a great leap forward in the evolution of political morality? The effusions that have greeted this measure are puzzling. It does nothing more than re-state what is already the law of the land. American forces were already forbidden to subject any captive “to cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment” as prohibited by the U.S. Constitution and the UN Convention Against Torture. This regurgitation of existing law is the extent of the McCain amendment, along with an adjuration to interrogators to follow written guidelines for rough stuff set down by the Pentagon.
But the partisans of atrocity in the Bush White House knew these laws when they set up the gulag’s torture regimen in 2001. They simply re-defined “torture” to accommodate any brutal technique they cared to implement, then declared that the Commander-in-Chief is beyond the reach of law in wartime — and that any underlings who commit crimes at his order are likewise absolved of legal liability. This sinister sophistry is still very much in operation — and remains unchallenged by the toothless amendment of the “maverick.”
This is borne out by a little-noticed announcement released by Bushist warlord Donald Rumsfeld earlier this month. The directive gives Rumsfeld — or anyone he deputizes to act for him — the power to “authorize exemptions” to those still-unformulated Pentagon guidelines restricting “inhumane” treatment, AFP reports. This mile-wide loophole makes a sick joke of the much-trumpeted crackdown on “abuse” in the Bush gulag.
The dual amendments are little more than a cynical PR ploy: torture will be condemned in public, but quietly continued in the former KGB camps and other secret hellholes that Bush has strung across the world like a barbed-wire necklace. The Pentagon’s own lawyers certainly understand the true nature of the game. As one told the Observer: “If detainees can’t talk to lawyers or file cases, how will anyone ever find out if they have been abused?” No one ever will, of course; that’s the point. With habeas corpus denied up front, the worst cases of torture and false imprisonment can now be buried forever in “indefinite detention;” the tribunals, with their access to appeals, will be reserved for open-and-shut showpieces.
These draconian measures reach far beyond a handful of hard-core terrorists. According to the Pentagon’s own figures, more than 21,000 innocent people have been caged without due process in Iraq alone, the Guardian reports. Hundreds more have been unjustly imprisoned around the world. A regime that thrives on fear requires a steady stream of “enemy combatants” to justify its unlimited “war powers.” The belly of this beast will never be full.
See annotations below:
Washington Post, Nov. 15, 2005
Senators Agree on Detainee Rights
Washington Post, Nov. 15, 2005
Senate Rebukes Bush on Iraq Policy
United States Senate, Nov. 11, 2005
McCain Amendment to 2006 Department of Defense Appropriations Bill
Washington Post, Nov. 14, 2005
Detainees Deserve Court Trials
New York Times, Nov. 12, 2005
Democrats Provided Edge on Detainee Vote
Agence France Presse, Nov. 9, 2005
Rumsfeld can authorize exceptions to new “humane” interrogation directive
The Observer, Nov. 13. 2005
Guantanamo Inmates to Lose All Rights
Slate.com, Nov. 11, 2005
Who They Are: The Double Standard that Underlies our Torture Policies
Information Clearinghouse, Sept. 10, 2005
Jose Padilla and The Death of Liberty
Agence France Press, Nov. 13, 2005
White House declines to totally rule out torture
New York Times, Nov. 13, 2005
‘We Do Not Torture’ and Other Funny Stories
Wikepedia
Habeas Corpus
Washington Post, July 16, 2005
Court Rules Military Panels to Try Detainees
Deep Blade Journal, July 16, 2005
Domination by Detention
Miami Herald, July 16, 2005
Ruling Lets U.S. Restart Trials at Guantanamo
LA Weekly, Jan. 14-20, 2005
Alberto Gonzales’ Tortured Arguments for Reigning Above the Law
Knight-Ridder, Jan. 26, 2005
Torture Treaty Doesn’t Bar `Cruel, Inhuman’ Tactics, Gonzales Says
New York Times, Dec. 15, 2002
Bush Has Widened Authority of CIA to Kill Terrorists
Washington Times, Jan. 8, 2003
Special Ops Get OK to Initiate Its Own Missions
Spiked, Nov. 11, 2002
Coward’s War in Yemen
The Guardian, Nov. 6, 2002
Drones of Death
New York Times, Jan. 20, 2005
Gonzales Excludes CIA from Rules on Prisoners
The Observer, June 13, 2004
The Secret World of US Jails
CounterPunch, Feb. 2, 2005
The Torture Memos: A Legal Narrative
Boston Globe, Jan. 20, 2002
CIA Takes on Major Military Role: ‘We’re Killing People!
Village Voice, Feb. 14, 2003
Our Designated Killers
Village Voice, Feb. 21, 2003
A U.S. License to Kill
Washington Post, Oct. 27, 2001
CIA Weighs ‘Targeted Killing’ Missions
Human Rights Watch, June 23, 2003
US Again Uses Enemy Combatant Label to Deny Basic Rights
New York Times, March 6, 2005
[Bush Order] Lets CIA Freely Send Suspects to Foreign Jails
The New Statesman, March 7, 2005
Review: Torture and Truth and The Torture Papers
San Diego Union-Tribune, Feb. 27, 2005
The Torture Papers: Full Faith and Credit of the U.S. Government
What everyone seems to be forgetting is that this statute is similar in nature to the statute congress passed to do away with Miranda rights.
The Supreme Court held that the statute was unconstitutional because Miranda was a constitutional holding by the court.
Congress has no power to overrule the Supreme Court on constitutional matters.
This statute may be headed for the same fate because of Rasul v Bush (link here).
In my #1
I was in reference to the statement "We see that all foreign captives in Bush’s worldwide gulag have now been stripped of the ancient human right of habeas corpus."
Hey religious conservatives!!!!
Maybe you ought to join your all christians are whackos friend in jail, Michael Scanlon who was just charged with criminal felnonies for gaming half the people in the United States??
I didn’t do it- the story of Michael "all the christians are whackos" Scanlon!
Then maybe you can enjoy your Diebold machines in hell where you belong, because there’s nothing religious about your freaks at all!!!!! Most of you are nothing but FAKE, aethiest zionist freaks who believe in nothing america stands for and rather would be living in Jordan or Israel!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
American Airlines is waiting for your ticket, Paul and the Marley boys!!!! Can you get in line now!???
:hehe:
Doug E.
RE #1, #2
I indicated the well-known (in legal scholarship and practice) principle of law that when the US Supreme Court rules on a constitutional matter, the US Congress cannot change or undo the holding.
Chris Floyd had posted "We see that all foreign captives in Bush’s worldwide gulag have now been stripped of the ancient human right of habeas corpus."
The current frivolous congress (remember Terry Schiavo and the instant vote against Murtha) is attempting to mess with habeas corpus.
But the success of that venture will depend on how Rasul v Bush (linked in my post #1) is interpreted. That is, was Rasul based on constitutional law or solely on jurisdictional statutes?
I say this because in Dickerson v US the court pointed out:
"Congress enacted 18 U. S. C. §3501, which in essence laid down a rule that the admissibility of such statements should turn only on whether or not they were voluntarily made. We hold that Miranda, being a constitutional decision of this Court,
may not be in effect overruled by an Act of Congress, and we decline to overrule Miranda ourselves. " (link here, bold added).
The Rasul decision had statements in it that habeas corpus predates the constitution and came to us thru the common law. Thus Rasul is a constitution based decision to some degree and cannot therefore be changed by congress.
The new congressional statute attempts to prevent those labeled "enemy combatants" by the president from using habeas corpus. Therefore the said statute may be unconstitutional because Rasul said they can use habeas corpus to test their detention and whether or not they are in fact enemy combatants.
Thanks for the hope Dred..I needed that after reading on the Wayne Madsen report that videos of children being sodomized and homoerotica male torture are being sent to the W.H. for their viewing pleasure. I am not being sarcastic….how can people pay taxes to support this kind of behavior? Some people put Madsen down, but he was one of three who asked questions at the Cynthia McKinny hearings on 9/11. I called many reps. and senator’s offices during the Katrina debacle. McKinny’s staff were about the only ones who gave a shit.
Not a surprise Molly if their staff are under influence of something else……read Madsen’s website and you’ll find alot more to the Israeli influence and corruption on Congress…
Doug E.