{Blogged by Brad from the long — very long — and winding — very winding — road.}
It was just a few weeks ago that I was exposed as being a “CIA Internet Fake” — whatever that meant — by the nutcase Fintan Dunne over at BreakForNews.com. Mr. Dunne still seems to have a problem contacting me, or at least writing me back upon my inquiry to ask him “What the hell are you smokin’, son? And can I get some?!”
But I digress. For now comes the news that I’m actually a Zionist disinformation artist secretly taking over the anti-war movement in order to…do…something. In fact, I’ve read the article twice, and I still can’t really tell what I’m actually supposed to be doing in my new secret role, because I can’t make much sense out of the article written by Eric Hufschmid. (Seriously, can’t these conspiracy theory whack-jobs at least try to make some sense when making these cases?) Other than that, all I can figure is that it’s Hufschmid who might well be the disinfo artist he’s accusing everyone else in the world to be, and that he seems to hate Jews and he seems to be a Republican (or at least hate anybody who ever supported a Democrat…I guess…good luck if you can make any more sense of it than I).
Anyway, if you can get through his incredibly long and confusing report, you’ll see that near the end, I am, along with Velvet Revolution, part of the great big super-secret scam to control the world!
Now if I could just figure out what the great big super-secret scam is, and when I get paid for it, we’ll all be in great shape!
Of course, as with the earlier shocking exposé revealing my secret work for the CIA, and my subsequent ridicule of the notion, my similar ridicule of…whatever Hufschmid’s premise is…would be exactly what I would do if he really was on to something! I’d try and discredit him with an article just like this one so that the horrible truth revealed via his cunning investigation would be laughed at and subsequently ignored!
So, once again, you — dear BRAD BLOG reader — don’t know what to believe any more do ya?! And, of course, that’s just what us Super-Secret Anti-War Zionist Internet CIA Fakes hope!
Phew…Hopefully, my evil agenda is now safe once again!
Man, this shit is exhausting.
Whew, that was tough. Agents, counter-agents, criminals, diversionists, obfuscationists, scam artists, counter-scam artists, "useful idiots".
He forgot one. "Useless idiots".
And I told them I did not know anything about your secret plans with Putin and that super outer space ray gun that will turn turn all of Wally O’Dell’s, Tom Delay’s and Feeney’s staff into poodles.
I swear it. 😎 😉 😀
Miss ya, ya Zionist you!
So open, transparent, secure elections are just another Zionist plot? Damn it! I knew I should’ve trusted Diebold.
A zionist!??? Whoa!!!! This guy’s one amazing crackpot….the only zionist I see left america for the world bank and his name is Paul "I control" Wolfowitz and gives the whole thing a bad name!!!
I guess I better check my "super secret checkbook" to make sure strange names haven’t appeared too……fancy that, with the old one two happenin!
Doug E.
Just remember,
Whatever they call the 6 or 7
its probably more true about them
Mabush’s last speech showed that
とりあえず出会い系です・・。
ttp://dp27036663.lolipop.jp/deai/index.html
Ohmigod, I have been duped. Okay Brad, how big is my file…..I wanna know and I wanna know now!
LOL. I read the article twice to try to understand where this guy was coming from. I have stated before that the Lie always comes with a little bit of Truth, that is the M.O. of the fallen ones ruining our country. I am very analytical and so often look to this as a curse. I know it is not and it is a very useful tool in discerning the truth from the lie. So, if you are part of the CIA, I will find out. Trust me, I have friends in very HIGH places too. 🙂
The article that was real interesting to me (and I need to look at it some more) was the one by Dunne. I briefly scanned the list of all the sites noted. Someone is afraid, very afraid, of what is happening on these blogs. I am so glad I finally arrived. M4
That was cool, I made a smiley face and out popped a ‘real’ smiley face…am getting more suspicious Brad. How did you take over my computer! (gonna try another one to amuse myself) 🙁
Does this mean we’re not all secret agents any more?
Do I get to keep the decoder ring?
Wait ’til they find out all our posts are encoded secret messages, then they’ll go nuts trying to decode them all.
Now it’s clear. Brad and Dick Cheney are not one and the same, as I suspected. Brad and Paul Wolfowitz are one and the same. Brad is in fact a sheep in Wolfowitz’ clothing (beg pardon).
The neo-cons are using erstwhile liberals as cover for their treachery, after first giving them the Manchurian candidate treatment. Note how exhausted Brad sounds…that’s not because of his travels, it’s because being programmed 24/7 taxes the mind and spirit.
Come back, Brad. We love you and need you. And please tell us…what is Angela Lansbury really like?
Brad,
I give you credit from many things: energy, communication skills, a mind, a heart, etc. I appreciate your efforts.
On my blog, I question what Fintan is up to. However, I would ask you and your readers / listeners to search for their own truth about 9/11. If there ever is a fair reckoning of which way is up, I submit that Hufschmid will look more accurate and reasonable than you give credit by a long way.
Typing from another undisclosed location (Winter Patriot – is that YOU shivering at the next computer?)
Mother Goose asked me to pass along a couple of super secret coded messages for Brad’s 6 or 7:
The dog barks at midnight.
and
Little Orphan Annie says, "Don’t forget to drink your Ovaltine"
shhhhh…pass it on!
(And extra points to anybody who can tell me where that last one came from)
wooooOOOOOOooooooooooooo…
Yowee! Is it safe to trust ourselves? Or are we ALL hallucinating?!
Love you…
My evil agenda is badder than your evil agenda!!!
# 14 – Gotcha.
—Ralphie
darn, my smiley face is gone now, just back to same old style 🙁
The shit is exhausting?
Brad, thank your lucky stars you didn’t drink what they
drank or sleep on their (dusty?) pillows or brush your
teeth from their tube. It could happen to you or me or
any of us. Let’s bless Bev Harris and Hufschmid for
their hard work, and give them some compassion.
And carry on.
pretty strong stuff there, don’t you think? phew!
Check this out , I hope to GOD this passes…http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.1070:
Well, it sounds to me like some little 9th grader with an overactive imagination (and probably an overdue book report on spies and codes and really neat stuff like that and mommymommymommy did I mention it’s all the zionists and I’m gonna catch me one of em and he’ll have to lead me to his secret hideout and stop his hungerstrike and then a spaceship will come down and…) is up way past his bedtime. However, He gets an AfrigginPLUS in Vague and Circular Reasoning 1901sd. Oh, and for some other class where you learn to add things such as bland analogies to your writing to further enhance the sophomoric charm and…GOOD GOD THAT GUY"S A FRIGGIN WHACKO! Is it just me, or is it like, his first day with the new thumbs and someone’s already given him Jolt and about 14,000 candy bars and now it’s all over but the cryin…?
BG said: "If there ever is a fair reckoning of which way is up, I submit that Hufschmid will look more accurate and reasonable than you give credit by a long way."
With all due respect, BG, Hufschmid loses from the get-go. To run a story like that in re: me, and not even bother to supply a shred of evidence for such a sillly claim, or — perhaps more aggregiously — not bother to contact me for comment (neither did Fintan, whose irresponsible stories about me he’s *never* bothered to contact me for), means that Hufschmid is out. Period. He’s also a Jew hater which, has nothing to do with policy, unfortunately. If he has a problem with Israel, I have no problem with that (I have many myself), but to take his swipe at Jews, as he does…Well, it all speaks for itself.
KestrelBrightEyes – "A Christmas Story". I’ll take my extra points now. Thanks!
My real name is not Ralphie. You see Little Orphan Annie gave the decoder ring to Ralphie and…
Never mind.
I believe I have found the answer to the neocon attacks on truth seekers.
It’s funny how some of the right wingers get all loopy when they hear somebody speak the truth. They can’t handle hearing it. (i.e., Cindy Sheehan, Ambassador Joe Wilson, Scott Ritter, Sen. Max Cleland, Richard Clarke) Nothing bothers these people more than the truth. It drives them up the friggin’ wall. They will smear anybody who speaks the truth. There is a reason for this, and it comes from the very foundation of the Neoconservative belief system.
The Neoconservatism movement is built upon the notion that its better to get people to believe in "noble lies" than have them unsettled by the truth.
The father of Neoconservatism, Leo Strauss, argued that: "Contemporary liberalism was the logical outcome of the philosophical principles of modern times, as practiced in the advanced nations of the Western world in the 20th century".
He believed that liberalism contained within it a natural tendency to believe knowledge is relative to the limited nature of the mind and the conditions of knowing, which in turn led to the rejection of religious and moral principles that he saw as permeating contemporary American society."– Wikipedia on Leo Strauss.
Thus, for Strauss, overcoming the belief in knowledge, which is called relativism, was of primary importance. The proponents of the theory believe they know "what’s good for the rest of us". These people believe that the American people are better off ignorant and blind, than with actual freewill. In their view, freewill can lead to rejection of religion and morals.
To put it another way, in the view of the Neocons, people are no different than a pack of wolves. In a wolf pack (no relation to neoconservative Paul Wolfowitz), the dogs need to know their place in the pecking order or the pack will become unstable and inefficient. Through dominance, submission, and aggression, each dog will find it’s place, and the pack will be happy. The Neocons believe that people need a hierarchy of order– people need to be given commands that are easy to understand, and they need to have a routine. Freewill is bad for the pack. Uncertainty is bad for the pack. Questioning the alpha-male puts the balance of the pack in danger. If the leader of the pack wants you to roll over, do it. Don’t ask questions, just do it. Good dog! You see, if the wolf pack can’t understand quantum mechanics, evolution, the general theory of relativity or esoteric spiritual or philosophical texts– teach them something they can understand, regardless of whether it’s right or not. Make it simple, make it rigid, and do not waiver from it ever. Stay the course, or the rest of the wolves may get restless. The pack needs, above all else, uniformity and security. They need to know what is good and what is bad. There is no grey area for a wolf. A wolf hunts, it doesn’t question it’s existence, it’s habitat, or the alpha-male.
Neoconservatism does not give Man much credit (or compassion). It is anti-humanist. It is sheer wolf. It believes ignorance is better than knowledge. It values power more than love. It fears science, knowledge and enlightenment. It fears foreign packs. But most of all, it fears its true nature as a human being. And thus, it fears truth. As such, neoconservatism is completely out of balance. It fails to recognize half of our given human nature. It disregards compassion, and knows not how to forgive. It thrives on competition and cannot handle cooperation. Neoconservatism is a philosophy of self-destruction.
So next time you see some neoconservative doing everything under the sun to avoid the truth– have pity on him. He has not yet realized that he is a human being. His world view does not permit him to seek the truth. On the contrary, a neocon has not evolved from his animal past. He has no other choice than to just "howl at the moon."
KestrelBrighteyes, you crack me up ! LMAO Jimbo , Love it, pack analogy fits…….
…which, decoded, said, "Don’t forget to drink your Ovaltine".
KBE – Mother Goose is in cahoots with 00Brad, our cuddly Wolfowitz in sheep’s clothing! Beware or be square! Jimbo, that was a nice piece (although I nearly skipped it because of an unfortunate name similarity other senior residents of Bradville might have feared) of writing. Thanks for the chuckles and the thought provoking stuff.
Love and Peace, Bob
#23 Jimbo….a wonderful piece, wow, I wish I could write like that. I so agree and haven’t even read Strauss. My heart beats faster when I hear/see/recognize Truth. M4
This is double00 -Shaggy reporting……I got the CIA files branded "Top Secret" for double00-Brad aka "Cheese Balls"
The file contains the following coded characters….
"Double-super-secret-speak background….The knave strikes at midnight, Kenny Blackwell has entered the coop….I repeat, Blackwell’s in the coop….I’ve already said too much-transmission cut."
(Maybe that means something related to Ohio is about to blow! over and out)
Doug E.
PS: Scooby-dooby-doo!
Doug E.
Brad,
I’ve been thinking about this ever since it first happened and have come up with a few ideas. I’m sure and WP have already kicked these around, and perhaps have e-mailed/IM’d with others on "what to do." So, forgive me if my comments are somewhat belated, repetitive, or have already been rejected.
As I see it, given your outstanding coverage of the Cindy Sheehan, DSM, Conyers investigations, the affidavits in re "latest scandal of the week", I thought that I’d take the liberty to check out a few things.
I’m pleased to report that your reputation doesn’t appear to have been affected. Your standing in the blogosphere is stellar; your links to your site appear to have been consistent; and you continue to have highly positive comments from both DC, in the forums, on other blogs, and by the Whispering Campaign.
This says nothing of your other pursuits, achievements, and accomplishments which are far too numerous to share here.
Given your formidable status, it is unclear to me what would prevent someone with your negotiation, skill, and mental ability to simply prove to all one thing: Nothing.
There is no need for you to prove anything. You need not consider yourself burdened with the requirement to justify your existence to anyone; nor are your accomplishments in any way diminished by a single comment.
Moreover, as you and WP have well put it several times, when one has an issue with something, it is their responsibility to deal with it. IN that spirit, I have taken your wise counsel and simply accepted "my issue" as mine, and it is not appropriate for me to discuss my specific observations, concerns, or topics when they are of no interest, concern, or relevancy to the larger issues you well cover on all media forums: Potential for impeachment, war crimes, voting rights, etc.
Thus, in my view given your statue that simply overshadows that of any of your peers, you simply can wave your hand, and the problem would go away by:
Offering your accusers the opportunity to guest blog, and let the blogging community see them for who they are, and that you and your fine intellect can easily outmatch them;
Offering your accusers the chance to appear live on radio, unrehearsed, and let them freely discuss their evidence, and let you show that your record, performance, and conduct is without question beyond reproach.
You have the power to choose whether you do or do not let this become an issue.
I offer the above comments simply because both you, WP, the other bloggers on this site, and your audience have taken the time to give me feedback which has been most helpful. In that spirit, I trust that given your wisdom you will soon find a solution, and this will be resolved.
That said, I recall the words of someone I respect who also blogs here: Winter Patriot. Sometimes someone needs step outside their own shoes, appreciate your difficult requirements, and understand that the world does not necessarily revolve around a single person, issue, or topic.
That is wise. And I have though a great deal about those words. I believe, given Winter Patriot’s wisdom, both of you will find a way to use this to your advantage. Given your public acclaim, the audience need not be proven anything for they already trust you.
The burden of proof rests with those who dare to suggest otherwise. If you truly desire to end this, there is an easy way and that is to allow your opponent to publicly collapse; or you can choose to continue to be annoyed by something that is but a wisp of dust in your shadow; or perhaps there is a deeper meaning to the source of your irritation.
The challenge shall be to use your skill, wise counsel, and novel approaches to rise above this. I trust given your great accomplishments this too shall simply prove to be a passing wind on a sea where far greater things shall be explored: The Good Ship Friedman.
Indeed, perhaps this incident could prove to be a useful mirror; perhaps there is something about your accuser that you may desire to have as a quality; perhaps you have something about the way that you do your things that you are not aware that can be improved. Perhaps there is something about their writing, word choice, or way they have presented their information that you desire to embrace as a higher standard for yourself.
Indeed, perhaps there are some things that they are doing that your admiration is something that is presently confused with confusion. I am only speculating.
For example, suppose there is something about the way that they have constructed their website; or allowed others to freely discuss issue; or their terms and conditions that are freely spelled out on what is or is not appropriate. These may be factors that are well established on your blog and are of no concern.
On the other hand, perhaps your accuser has specifically said or shaded something in a manner and form that is novel. Perhaps they have specifically stated "how to solve a problem". Indeed, perhaps "their approach" to an issue reminds you of something that is familiar, but also uncertain.
Perhaps your accuser has delineated in express terms the requirements they have for civil discourse, and they have done so in a manner that is unlike your own. Their approach, although unfamiliar, may be something that you and your peers may desire to embrace. Perhaps, after great though and careful consideration you may choose to define the issue as something that the need not gather your concern.
With a long note like this, I normally would have sent an e-mail or posted it on my blog. But I understand that there is a large volume of e-mail that you receive, and there has been some concern of late as to the links that I or others may include.
I wish to apologize for desiring to provide information to someone who is as busy as you, but do so in a manner that is accessible.
My thought was that given my long messages, it would be of great respect to your, Winter Patriot, and your intelligent readers that if they chose to skip over my material, they could do so with little movement of their mouse/scroller.
My goal is simply to share with others what I have been thinking. In that spirit, I have grown to admire your concise writing skills and formidable power and astuteness in quickly embracing complex issues and succinctly stating them. Your sill is something that takes many years to develop and it it not something that you should question at any time, nor should you fear that your audience ever doubts.
Going forward, I would hope that in the future that should I write something that I find of possible interest to you and your readers that they will know, on their own without me calling attention to myself, that there might be something for them to review.
I shall leave it up to the good wisdom and experience of your readers, associates, other bloggers, and the chorus of colleagues who admire you to continue with their work.
I would like to apologize specifically to several of the bloggers who have posted here. My current comments are rather long, but I feel that given the continuing issue, that it is appropriate that I share this perspective.
My view is that sometimes people have something to say, not because they desire you to do or not do something; but because they desire for you to improve. That may be the key to what your accusers are saying.
Look at their accusation not as a personal attack, but as a message and feedback or opportunity for improvement. Indeed, perhaps the message and underlying feedback is simply, "We need not consider the response," and move on.
Once we make that decision, we make a decision to "cut off" and that should be the end of it. But there is something about this particular interaction that is novel. I believe your goal should be to seek to acquire the new perspective, feedback, and raised standard that will continue to improve your performance.
Do not look at your accuser as someone who is trying to do you harm; rather, use their feedback, as if they were an opponent, as simply that: A message.
A far greater problem would be if, despite your statute, you got no feedback. That would truly be a far greater disservice toward your end.
Thus, I believe your goal could be turned upside down: Look at this not as a challenge to surmount or resolve; but look at this as a doorway to learning a new skill, a new way of doing something, but acquire and embrace that skill in a manner that will pursue your greater dreams. That may be the hidden message of this accusation. Again, it is only for you to choose how, of if, you desire to use this catalyst.
Over the years I have had the good fortune to consider things. And I have rarely found anyone who has achieved so much as you. You should be proud of what you do; and know that your work continues to inspire those who you may not personally know.
Indeed, sometimes people look to you not because of who you are, but because of your ability to touch many. In that spirit, and by way of anecdote, that was my goal in sharing with you and your readers my personal anecdote of having a challenge with contacting others through e-mail. I had assumed, given your statute and well connectedness, that if there was a problem that could be solved, that it could be remedied.
Also, after careful review of the situation, I thought that I could look at the website of Raw Story and rely on that information: They list you as Raw Radio. Perhaps there is confusion on my part.
IN any event, given the apparent close association between Raw Story, BradBlog, and yourself, I was under the impression that if there was a real issue with communication problems that given the close proximity between you, Congressman Conyers, and Raw Story, that we could come to some sort of agreement or arrangement as to how we might resolve particular issues.
Unfortunately, my effort to rely on that public information failed; and I incorrectly assumed that the linkage between you, RawStory, and Congressman Conyers was something that could address my issue.
I mention this, because as you well know, a few months ago your blog no longer was listed on the Huffington Post. As I recall, this was somewhat unusual, and many of us were wondering what was going on. Indeed, with quick e-mails and a few short exchanges, it appears as though the technical issue was largely related to a copying error. Regardless the actual problem, from my perspective as a listener/reader/audience, I thought that BradBlog, you, and your colleagues had a special relationship with your audience: If you had a problem, you could rely on us to step in.
I did make several attempts to discuss my concerns with the HuffingtonPost; I didn’t hear anything, nor did I expect to. However, at this point, I have learned that the number of comments is backlogged.
I only mention this because as these events were unfolding with the HuffingtonPost, I had a problem getting contact with others. I had hoped that, in the spirit of respect and admiration for your well connectedness, that you or others who read this blog might be of some assistance.
Indeed, I was given some special assistance by several bloggers who specifically reposted my links from this blog to the ConyersBlog. In that spirit, I had assumed, given the relationship between you, Conyers, and Raw Story, things could get solved.
But, imagine my surprise when, after posting a link about my thoughts about Ambassador Wilson, and my desire to have that information forwarded that I got asked about "what I was doing." I was surprised.
Indeed, I was more surprised, that given my problem with RawStory, that when I attempted to seek assistance, and outline my concerns, it was taken as if "someone didn’t want to hear it."
OK. I accept that.
But imagine my surprise, when after careful review of your blog, I find no specific rules our outlines telling me how to post a quote, I suddenly get a lecture on "what is or is not supposed to happen."
Added to that, I was told in no uncertain terms that I had violated specific rules. OK. I see no rules, but I’ll play along.
But then it really struck a nerve, when despite my desire to solicit your advice and assistance, I had personal information posted.
I don’t mind that. I do hope that a small act like that is taken for what it is: An error.
But I do not see what could possibly have prompted the response: I, as a devoted fan, I believe rightly, assumed that if I was having a problem with RawStory, that you and Raw could address the issue.
Indeed, the links are to my cite. So, why would I believe that I was trying to "hide" something?
That is what I have learned: The great lesson, is that sometimes people take admiration, respect, and fondness in a way that is not intended.
Sometimes, those we most admire can do things that confuse us. Not because they desire to inflict harm, but they simply choose to do what they want to do to contribute.
That is what you accuser is trying to do: They want you to be better. They want you to be more that you currently are.
Your goal is to decide whether you want to let the admiration of your opponent turn into admiration of a loyal ally.
That is your choice. I choose you as my ally. I choose Winter Patriot as my ally. For you both intend to do good; and you both desire to achieve great things.
In that spirit, perhaps you might wish to make specific things clear. I, as a devoted fan, may be mistaken in my assumption that you and Arianna, John Conyers, and Raw Story are as close. I still assume you can simply get things done, if that is what you desire to achieve.
However, if you desire to "not solve" the issue with your accuser [whatever that is], then this will continue to fester.
Let there be not mistake: The fact that personal information has been posted about me is of no consequence. But I do take it as feedback of "what is possible" when someone desires to do something.
I shall be wary. I am glad that I can blog and write on my own site. And I am especially happy that I have taken the time to learn more of what can happen.
In that spirit, if there is something that you or the other bloggers would like to say to me, you are free to do so in your blogs and provide links. Or you can skip over this information.
Either way, know that any effort to intimidate me or anyone else or to dissuade others from speaking their mind and dare to be inspired by you will fail. You, in your infinite wisdom, have inspired others; they dare to speak out; and they dare to say things because you are a public figure.
As am I.
Who am I? My name is Constant. And I had the good fortune of being publicly recognized by the DNC and the Ranking Member on the Judiciary Committee simply for a few words.
With time, you may learn more. With time, I may choose to share more.
And with time, perhaps you will accept the information from your accuser as simply that: A gift. They dare to admire your status with a simple accusation.
Use that. And you will be better.
Or pass it up. And wait until you desire to improve at another time.
Either way, people dare to take the time to provide feedback. They are either useful or not useful; the information is either helpful or not helpful.
It is your choice whether you move on. Your adversary has only given you feedback. It is your choice what you do or do not do about it.
When you are on set, the PA will control the noise. At rolling, you are ready. Background is the ready command. And at action, it is real.
Choose whether you are prompted by the PA or rolling.
There is no right or wrong answer. But choose one that works for you. When you make your decision, cast aside all the other options, then proceed.
If needed, the director can adjust as you well know and do it over. Perfection is not required, unless that is the standard you impose on yourself.
We, your fans, do not put that standard on you. Your job, I believe is to raise your standard, and to permit yourself more flexibility and imperfection.
As all grains of sand or stones on the beach, each is different. Some are more bright or refined that others. But each of the grains and rocks when added, form the perfect beach. As do you and your fans form the perfect opposition to demand improvement in this nation.
Do not demand perfection of yourself. Simply choose your own standard, and promise yourself to do what you desire to do.
There is no right or wrong answer in life: Your answer is the answer that will work for you.
Thank you for giving me the chance to speak. I hope that in the future, if you or others would like to read what I have written, you’ll know what do. Other than that, I may or may not be available.
Best wishes and I trust that you will respect the desire of some to maintain their privacy; while at the same time not expecting others to meet standards that you are not willing to demonstrate.
Others may or may not respond to you; given I have not had a response to my concern, I am not confused as to why this issue with your accuser is something that is annoying. Just as some choose to respond in their unique way, so too do others enjoy not responding when you need help.
Remember, if you need help all you have to do is ask. But if you offer to help, don’t expect others to reciprocate; nor should your good faith effort to be civil be made with the others will reciprocate. Your gift of power is freely given; and your desire to have others assist you appears to be something you want others to give, but with the full expectation that future requests for reciprocation be ignored.
If you ignore other people when they have a bonafide desire to solve problems, then there is every reason to expect that when you have an issue, others will not respond.
Your adversary, now your accuser is simply doing what you have done to others.
Why are you most bothered by what is going on? Because he isn’t responding to you.
Why does that annoy you? Because he, your adversary, most reminds you of someone you know well. Those who act civilly toward others, but apparently violate some arbitrary standard, appear to warrant a surprising response.
Indeed, your opponent is most annoying to you because your adversary and accuser reminds you of yourself. You see in him something you do not like about yourself, but have not faced.
At this juncture, your task is to decide whether you desire to address that, or wait until someone else freely walks along, thinks that you are powerful, and mistakes your connectedness with the ability to solve a relatively simple problem.
I had a problem that I thought you might be able to help me out with. I got slapped in the face.
Your adversary is simply doing the same thing. Your problem is that when your opponent does what you do and blows you off, you get upset.
You and Winter Patriot have given me the course to come forward. And I have made contact with a lady I most admire.
I am not afraid of being a public figure. You are.
That is why I am winning.
I did more by doing nothing that many will ever dream. I have 30,000 people who know my quote; and Winter Patriot has but a handful of links to his sight.
continue with your whispering campaign. It is but another route to the same objective. I, in my way, do what I think is right; and you and your colleagues do what you believe is right.
When you are willing to be unfearful of your status, you will find the answers. Until then, know that I and others will remain inspired, and continue to improve and find solutions.
That’s what living in America under freedom and a constitution is all about. To move forward. Improve. And make things better.
So choose your path, commit to it, and don’t look back at me, or others. You have the ability to move forward. Your challenge is to examine why you choose to react the way you do.
I think I know what the answer is. But the decision and work is up to you.
Good luck.
Thank you for inspiring me to thank Barbra Streisand for her kind remarks about me before the DNC and on her website. If you want to read more, Prissy Patriot was kind enough to run with the Exclusive.
Constant
Author
"Beware the Leader"
Indeed, Constant, thank you and Hello Brad
Brad,
We met at Camp Casey in Crawford-msfo. I kept meaning to get back to you-the time went fast.
You did an OUTSTANDING job at Camp Casey and at the Peace House. Thank you for your hard work, the families very much appreciated the chance to get their message to others without the cut and paste of FOXCNN…
Why talk to the likes of them-when we have Brad and RAW Story, TruthOut and a few others who will not distort the military families message? MSM wanted to run the us against them…No, no, no.
MSM is in a free fall, the truth tellers numbers will continue to increase. They would apparently rather die than tell the truth. OK-and who shall miss their distortions? Look at the mess they helped with…
We had the facts on our side and that is what we wished to present. Thank you for being a truthful source of media.
CIA and Velvet Revolution….yes, I heard about that. In fact, I have the VR flag on my site and I don’t have plans to take over the world. Did Prissy miss something?
You mean you get to do this on Uncle Sam’s payroll? How does Prissy sign onto the gravy train? She’s doing work they should be anyway….
As someone who has met Brad….sure, he’s smart enough to do that kind of work- but BEEP-wrong answer, try again.
Sorry to have left you so much reading,
Hugs to Brad and Constant,
Prissy Patriot
Hey Constant,
Who exactly are you? Every time I’ve run into it is a very strange encounter.
You have accused people including myself of "plagarism". What on earth are you talking about?
Look, I think 90% of the problems between the blogosphere can be solved by simple direct communication. Enough with this "mis-communication" nonsense!
Please explain to me why you took my copying your words from your post as "plagarism". I did say they were posted by Constant, but did not post the address.
What is the issue here?
The same thing happened with someone called plunger. He posted comments from several blogs at Crooks and Liars and was accused of plagarism.
He should have included the author’s name, I agree. But people have gotten too panicky with this and are really taking it too far.
If someone is spreading everyone’s words around the internet, that does not entail plagarism! It is meant for "others" to be able to see the truth and read for themselves, and decide for themselves what all of that is. And most of the time they should remember the name of where it came from. But no one is intentionally trying to plagarize anybody.
Lets get that little problem solved, so that more people don’t turn into "Fintan Dunne" and start spreading slander on everybody else. I agree with what you said.
We need to have no more mis-communications in the scheme of things, so that all of us are working together while on our seperate places or not. Together we’ll change the whole government and together, once we agree we’ll stop the garbage from making anymore messes based on lies.
Doug E.
I don’t know who Constant is, but I’ve been reading him for five months and feel I am a better person for it.