JOSH MITTELDORF: Making The Most Of What You’ve Got

Share article:

Guest blogged by Josh Mitteldorf.

INTRODUCTION {by Winter Patriot}: Josh Mitteldorf came to our attention when his piece about the 2004 ‘election’ was published in Philadelphia, as reported here. Since then, we have learned that Josh Mitteldorf is a renaissance man. What a remarkable set of links on his home page! We are indeed fortunate to have Josh with us for the Blogathon and I’m very happy to present a column he has written for the occasion:

Making The Most Of What You’ve Got
by Guest Blogger Josh Mitteldorf

This is a story of my own brand of do-it-yourself political activism.

I’m a numbers geek, not a politician. Usually, I’m comfortable with that. I’ve got my role, they’ve got theirs. But when I first understood the statistical evidence that the 2004 presidential vote was stolen, I couldn’t help but think: What this calls for is not a rigorous academic paper about standard deviations and p values. What we need is some coverage.

So what I did was that I wrote a rigorous academic paper about standard deviations and p values.

It was only after a bout with postpartum depression that I began to think about expanded visibility and greater impact. What else might I do, within the purview of my role as numbers geek, and without bending my personality out of shape?

Even though I feel like nobody special, without connections to the press or big-time pols, I’m not completely powerless. Everyone knows someone who knows someone – six degrees of separation, and all that. It occurred to me I could call Joe Hoeffel.

Twenty years ago, Joe Hoeffel worked in my wife’s law office. She was kind enough to give him a job when he was between political gigs, and finishing a law degree at night. But in the meantime, Joe has gone on to be 3-term congressman from Montgomery County (PA) and long ago stopped returning my calls. Then last fall he tried to run for Senate and lost resoundingly to Pennsylvania’s venerable Arlen Specter. Now he’s once again between political gigs and willing to answer my calls. So here was my plan:

Edison/Mitofsky was holding their exit poll results from last November close to their chest. They have no interest in releasing the raw data for public scrutiny. But I thought they wouldn’t resist a subpoena. For a subpoena, you need either a legislative hearing or a lawsuit. Who had standing to initiate a lawsuit over the conduct of election, and subpoena evidence from Edison/Mitofsky? Joe Hoeffel, that’s who. Officially, Joe lost to Arlen Specter by a 10% margin. But the exit polls showed them in a dead heat. 10% is a very big gap for a poll with a 3% margin of error. In fact, PA had the 4th highest gap in the country.

I approached Joe first with an email, relating the whole story and attaching my academic paper. (We geeks gotta have something we can hide behind when we’re trying something scary.)

Joe was completely gracious. He was willing to listen to what I had to say. I asked if I could come to his office. He invited me to lunch….and I learned something from him. I learned that politicians don’t think like actuaries. Statistical proof for me may just be a page full of numbers for him. But the flip side of this difference is that he thinks about things I don’t usually consider. He’s exquisitely sensitive to political and social realities. “What are the newspapers saying about your theory?” Joe asked me. “What does Dennis Kucinich say about this? He’s right there on the ground in Ohio.”

“I wasn’t really expecting to win because the newspapers still had me twelve points behind in a poll the week before the election. I was happy to do as well as I did, actually.”

Joe was keenly aware that if he sued the state over the vote count, he would be branded a sore loser, and that would make his political comeback that much harder. “But what about making sure the votes are counted correctly next time you run for office?” I asked. That was a new idea for him, not easy for him to assimilate over lunch.

Joe Hoeffel wasn’t about to subpoena Mitofsky for the exit poll data, but I’d had an informative lunch, and I was emboldened to continue looking for creative avenues into the establishment. A piano buddy was talking with me about this predicament the next week, and I heard her say, “…if only Eliot Spitzer would get on this case.”

Yeah, right. Eliot Spitzer, New York’s white knight may be incorruptible and intrepid, but he’s tied up regulating the financial markets, and shows no interest in election integrity. He’s a busy man. Rumor has it he’s running for governor….How does one reach Eliot Spitzer, anyway?

It was exactly one day later that I got a call from an investment advisor in New York. They have a new investment product. Yawn. The fund manager is going to be in New York on Monday. I almost hung up. “The best time for you to meet him would be if you wouldn’t mind coming to a luncheon that our firm is hosting tomorrow – actually it’s a fundraiser for Eliot Spitzer.”

“I’ll be there!”

As I said, I’m a statistician. I don’t deal with Venus in the house of Sagittarius or the alignment of cosmic energy waves. But I did do a back-of-the envelope calculation for the probability of this coincidence and came out with 1 chance in 2,376,849. On Monday, I eschewed rubber chicken, but had a full two minutes to shake Elliot’s hand, to place in it a packet of election articles, a letter showing that New York had the third-highest exit poll discrepancy in the country, and a personal appeal: Would he, in his capacity as Attorney General, authorize an investigation into the accuracy of New York’s vote count? He looked me in the eye and promised to read it and get back to me.

———–

Every year I do a 10-mile road race down the length of Broad St in Philadelphia. And every year, Ed Rendell is standing on the sidelines, cheering us on. He used to come out when he was the city’s Mayor and now that he’s Governor, he treks in from Harrisburg the first Sunday morning in May just because he’s an old pol and we’re his flock. Somehow, you can’t miss him, on the sidewalk of South Broad, bursting out of his blue polyester warm-up jacket. Well, this year I stopped to introduce myself, dripping sweat with nothing on but my running shoes and a pair of shorts. “Governor, I’ve been working with a group of statisticians who believe we have evidence that votes were stolen in the last election. It’s happening all over the country, but Pennsylvania is one of the worst – a 10% gap between the exit polls and the official counts from those same precincts where the exit polls were taken.”

“That’s not the information I have,” the Governor replied.

“Is there someone on your staff I might talk to, to present the evidence?”

The next week, I had an appointment with Rendell’s chief of staff, Donna Cooper.

———–

Getting attention and respect in the media is just as important, maybe more important than reaching mainstream politicians. Once I started looking for them, there were opportunities to approach news moguls as well. I have an old friend who knew Paul Krugman in the 1970’s when they were in college. There’s a woman who answered an ad to buy my house ‘for sale by owner’ who is a news anchor for NBC-TV’s Philadelphia station. A neighbor is good friends with the program director for Fresh Air with Terry Gross.

Each one of these contacts is a lottery ticket. When my number comes up, it’s going to be a big splash. But even when these contacts fail to develop into a full-blown victory, I’ve got to figure that I’m spreading the word, gaining a little more credibility for an idea no one wants to touch. Maybe this is the first time that someone has heard serious questions about integrity of the 2004 vote count; maybe by the third or the fourth or the fifth time it will seem real, and he’ll respond.

So I’m out there looking for opportunities. I’m doing it. You can, too.

{Winter Patriot again}: That’s quite a piece, don’t you think? Thanks very much to Josh Mitteldorf for that.

What do you think of it? What else would you like to know?

Please leave a comment or a question [or both!] here on this thread, and if we’re lucky, Josh just might drop by at some point during the weekend, and … we know he’s pressed for time … and he told us he couldn’t make any promises … but he did sound tempted … and he sure seems like the sort of fellow who can’t pass up a lively discussion! 😉

This item is part of the First Annual BRAD BLOGATHON, conceived and implemented by readers of The BRAD BLOG! Please help keep Brad blogging. You can click HERE to donate using PayPal or your credit card, or click HERE to donate using snail mail. Many thanks on behalf of Brad and the Bloggers behind the Blogathon!

Share article:

Reader Comments on

JOSH MITTELDORF: Making The Most Of What You’ve Got

30 Comments

(Comments are now closed.)


30 Responses

  1. 1)
    Catherine a said on 7/8/2005 @ 2:14pm PT: [Permalink]

    Josh,

    It’s great to read how you’ve followed up on opportunities to inform politicians and others about the election polls vs. official results.

    Can you say something about your role in the Election Data Archive?

  2. 3)
    Robert Lockwood Mills said on 7/8/2005 @ 2:27pm PT: [Permalink]

    Josh, you’re everything the political right hates… intellectual, well read, humorous, shaggy-haired, talented, and unafraid to speak truth to power.

  3. 4)
    Peg C said on 7/8/2005 @ 2:47pm PT: [Permalink]

    Josh, your persistence in this struggle to get the truth a hearing is impressive; I am filled with admiration and gratitude.

    Have you had any breakthrough media successes? You’re well-known on the Web, of course; but I’m unaware of much mainstream media coverage, except immediately following Mitofsky’s scandalous "chatty dems" rebuttal.

  4. 5)
    jpentz said on 7/8/2005 @ 2:53pm PT: [Permalink]

    Dear Josh,

    My brain is mush when it comes to statistics and mathematics. I admire anyone who can do that piece and can put the facts out there. I do know that Edison Mitofsky took several months to reconcile the "exit polls" and produce some kind of public report.

    And that was just illogical. Numbers are numbers. I know that much. Numbers are logical and they don’t just change . .nor should it take months to put the numbers out there.

    Facts are facts. Numbers are numbers. I am not good at math, but I can do THIS math to know something was up when they couldn’t just say "here are the numbers."

    To me it looked like they were trying to come up with some way for the numbers to be believable. But numbers don’t lie . .nor can they be altered or changed to reflect desired outcome.

    I am glad there are people like you to set the record straight.

    I do know news . .so I am also making some noise by just bringing attention to the fact of what real news is reporting and what is Fake news just by showing example. At this time, I leave the reporting to great people like Brad. I just present facts of what others are saying to show the lies.

  5. 6)
    PetGoat said on 7/8/2005 @ 2:57pm PT: [Permalink]

    Bless you, Dr. Mitteldorf, for your courage to pursue the truth–
    whatever the consequences, wherever it may lead. You sir are
    an inspiration and a guiding light.

  6. 7)
    Robert Lockwood Mills said on 7/8/2005 @ 3:08pm PT: [Permalink]

    Numbers don’t lie. Exactly. Efforts to rationalize the discrepancy between the exit polls and the tabulated vote are in fact conspiracy theories, and those that attempt to it (like Mitofsky, debunking his own work) are in reality tin-foil hat wearers.

  7. 8)
    PetGoat said on 7/8/2005 @ 3:08pm PT: [Permalink]

    One question: USCountVotes seems to be unwilling to deal
    with TruthIsAll’s thesis from democraticunderground that
    points out that the exit polls say the sample shows ex-Gore
    2000 voters at 37% and ex-Bush 2000 voters at 42%.

    http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/200.../epolls.0.html

    Since Gore actually got more votes in 2000 this suggests that
    Mitofsky’s 2004 was actually skewed for Bush! What is your
    take on this? Or are you unwilling to address data that
    cast doubt on the validity of the exit poll results?

    If so, why?

  8. 9)
    Josh Mitteldorf said on 7/9/2005 @ 1:20am PT: [Permalink]

    The website that PetGoat cites tabulates results of a CNN poll, breaking down 2004 voters into various overlapping groups.

    One analysis in particular relates Presidential choice in 2004 to Presidential choice in 2000 (including those who didn’t vote in 2000 but did vote in 2004).

    When you multiply these numbers and add them up, results indicate that Kerry beat Bush by 51% to 48%, which is very close to what the Mitofsky exit poll showed.
    So I’m not sure what PetGoat means when he says it "casts doubts on the validity of the exit poll results."

  9. 11)
    PetGoat said on 7/9/2005 @ 6:49am PT: [Permalink]

    Thank you, Dr. Mitteldorf, for your reply.

    TruthIsAll’s analysis has intrigued many of us laymen
    because it is so easy to understand.

    His argument as I understand it is that the ex-2000 vote
    figures show that Mitofsky’s sample is in fact skewed toward
    Bush while Mitofsky’s Chatty Dem theory supposes that it’s
    skewed toward Kerry.

    Your argument as I understand it asserts that Mitofsky’s data
    is right. I would much appreciate it if you guys could square
    your analyses.

    As one who spent 20 years in cowardly apathy, I thank you
    again for your courageous devotion to truth.

  10. 12)
    jen said on 7/9/2005 @ 8:25am PT: [Permalink]

    Thank you for the fantastic post Josh! and for all the time, energy and thought you put into exposing election fraud!

    I realize this is out of your line of expertise, but with all the research and connections you have relating to election fraud, I’m wondering if you’ve heard anything regarding Repub "plants" in the Dem party?

    I first heard of this thru Brad’s interview with Sherole Eaton, Whistleblower from Ohio, who talked about the fact that the Dems on the Board of Elections in Hocking Co., OH were actually NOT Dems. (Appointed by and serving at the "pleasure" of Mr. K. Blackwell…)

    I also heard from a friend (through her correspondence with Jane Mitakides, D-OH) that Mitakides was of the belief that the election was won by jr. through a number of unethical and questionable tactics – One of those being a Republican Campaign operated mostly out of churches where the faithful were instructed to Mis-ID themselves to Democratic callers during the campaign and on election day itself. This was to created over-confidence during the campaign and confusion on election Day in the Ohio Exit Polls.

    Personally, after all the reading of research and articles I’ve done since before Nov. 2004, I have no doubt or question the election was a fraud, but I’m curious about these tactics and wonder if you have any knowledge of them.

    And… do you have any ideas or suggestions of anything "we" can do to pressure Edison/Mitofsky to release the raw exit poll data?

    Thank you Josh!

  11. 13)
    Torqued said on 7/9/2005 @ 11:58am PT: [Permalink]

    Here is one of the more recent compilations (there are others) of TruthIsAll‘s work for those that haven’t followed on DU. Thanks Josh for all you do.

  12. 14)
    Catherine Guadagnino said on 7/10/2005 @ 9:40am PT: [Permalink]

    Josh,

    Just read your article! Now if we could clone YOU.
    Or maybe someone gets the message they could do the same thing! Network! Dig! Make Noise!

    I try and sign everything I can over the computer, I am a political nut, c-span junkie, and a real pain in the ass to my family and friends, but I am getting them to think and I back everything I say with facts and more facts.Bye the way I am 63, but not dead!

    People like you are a Godsend.

    Keep it up and Thank You

  13. 15)
    PetGoat said on 7/10/2005 @ 11:43am PT: [Permalink]

    People like you are a Godsend too, Catherine. Keep up the
    good work. Let me suggest that you join Winter Patriot’s
    "Whispering Campaign" and write short essays, preferably
    footnoted to mainstream news sources, and leave them in
    laundromats and on bus seats and in the boxes of free
    newspapers. That way you can be a pain in the ass to perfect
    strangers!

    I’d suggest short, half-sheet essays because a page full of
    words is kind of intimidating. Or lately I’ve seen some nice little
    booklets made from quarter-sheets folded and stapled and
    printed on both sides.

    http://psstpsstpsst.blogspot.com/

  14. 16)
    metamars said on 7/12/2005 @ 8:30am PT: [Permalink]

    I don’t think we should count on state governments following uscountvotes.org guidelines by 2008. The corruption in FL and OH, e.g., are a matter of record. If Blackwell uses the same rigged system to guarantee that he become Ohio’s next governor, we may be talking about 2058 before we have a system we can trust there. 🙂

    I have sketched out a extra-governmental way to vote, via a parallel system, that relies on massive redundance and id verification via local organizations that the voter belongs to. The purpose is not to replace official systems, but to keep them honest by allowing open, redundant ‘exit poll’ type voting from the comfort of your home computer. I believe the system would be dirt cheap to implement, and require almost no additional effort from voters. See:

    http://www.therandirhodesshow.c...howtopic=58159

    Would somebody be kind enough to bring it to Mitteldorf’s attention? I would like to get his input.

(Comments are now closed.)


Please help The BRAD BLOG, BradCast and Green News Report remain independent and 100% reader and listener supported in our 23rd YEAR!!!

ONE TIME
any amount...

MONTHLY
any amount...

OR VIA SNAIL MAIL
Make check out to...
Brad Friedman/
BRAD BLOG
7095 Hollywood Blvd., #594
Los Angeles, CA 90028

RECENT POSTS

But Here’s Another Post That Comes AFTER the Stay-on-Top Test!

But is it really under the sticky post?

Trying Out Stay-on-Top Functionality

How does it work?

You tell me!

‘Dangerous Times’: Climate Scientist Warns Trump ‘Censorship’ Endangering National Security: ‘BradCast’ 3/6/2026

Guest: Dr. Peter Gleick; Also: Admin deported at least 50 legal Venezuelan migrants; Judge says South Sudan deportations violated court order

This is the Sub Sub title line. Have added it so that we can see how the spacing works everywhere with both sub headers...

TEST

Guest: Election expert Marilyn Marks on GA 2018 Lt. Gov. election contest as state moves to unverifiable barcoded ballots; Also: FL 2020 GOP power-grab update; IA Repubs vote to NOT count absentee ballots...

Investigators reportedly examining federal judge's long history of alleged domestic abuse, while Congressional impeachment looms...

The Attempted 2018 Voter Suppression Begins: ‘BradCast’ 8/20/2018

And other news, both good and bad, around the country and world, 78 days out from the midterm elections...

A New Test Post for Linux61

This is one of those famous sub-titles you've heard so much about, that have been so vexing

And this, believe it or not, is a sub-sub-title!...

Sunday ‘Cutting Corners’ Toons

THIS WEEK: Big Barbaric Bill ... Conman's Clowns ... Anti-Semitism ... In Memoriam ...

‘A World of Tyrants, Bribes, and Influence’: ‘BradCast’ 5/22/2025

Guests: Heather Digby Parton of Salon, 'Driftglass' of 'Pro Left Podcast'...

‘Green News Report’ – May 22, 2025

With Brad Friedman & Desi Doyen...

And Then They Came for Members of Congress…: ‘BradCast’ 5/20/2025

Guest: Attorney Keith Barber; Also: Noem doesn't know what Habeas Corpus means; Paramount owner wants CBS News to roll over to Trump...

‘Green News Report’ – May 20, 2025

With Brad Friedman & Desi Doyen...

Appeals Court Blocks Last Route for Voters to Challenge Violations of the Voting Rights Act: ‘BradCast’ 5/19/2025

Guest: Justin Levitt, former Dep. Asst. A.G. at DOJ; Also: Springsteen sounds alarm; Far-right loses in Romania; SCOTUS blocks Trump again...

Sunday ‘Now Hoarding’ Toons

THIS WEEK: From the Middle East ... to Capitol Hill ... and Across the MAGAVerse ...

Mad World: ‘BradCast’ 5/15/2025

Birthright citizenship and nationwide injunctions at SCOTUS; GOP tax and health care cuts in the House; Eliminating FEMA, dismantling NWS before hurricane season; Noem's surreal tattoo testimony; Souter's warning...

‘Green News Report’ – May 15, 2025

With Brad Friedman & Desi Doyen...

About Brad Friedman...

Brad is an independent investigative journalist, blogger and broadcaster.
Full Bio & Testimonials…
Media Appearance Archive…
Articles & Editorials Elsewhere…
Contact…
He has contributed chapters to these books…
…And is featured in these documentary films…

BRAD BLOG ON THE AIR!

THE BRADCAST on KPFK/Pacifica Radio Network (90.7FM Los Angeles, 98.7FM Santa Barbara, 93.7FM N. San Diego and nationally on many other affiliate stations! ALSO VIA PODCAST: RSS/XML feed | Pandora | TuneInApple Podcasts/iTunesiHeartAmazon Music

GREEN NEWS REPORT, nationally syndicated, with new episodes on Tuesday and Thursday. ALSO VIA PODCAST: RSS/XML feed | Pandora | TuneInApple Podcasts/iTunesiHeartAmazon Music

Media Appearance Archives…

AD
CONTENT

ADDITIONAL STUFF

Brad Friedman/
The BRAD BLOG Named...

Buzz Flash's 'Wings of Justice' Honoree
Project Censored 2010 Award Recipient
The 2008 Weblog Awards