We can’t fight every stupid, idiotic, dangerous or perilous thing during the Trump Era, can we? I know I can’t, personally. But I don’t speak for everyone else. And one person’s stupid or idiotic may be another’s dangerous or perilous. An interesting debate over picking battles and who gets to decide which ones should be waged is at the heart of today’s BradCast. [Audio link to full show follows this summary.]
FIRST UP… however, speaking of dangerous, Donald Trump lackey and MAGA merchandiser (or “sycophantic suck-up” as Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse accurately described him today), Kash Patel was confirmed for a ten-year term as FBI Director by cowardly, sycophantic suck-up Republicans in the U.S. Senate today. All Democrats voted against him. Just two Republicans (Collins and Murkowski) joined them.
Aside from being wildly unqualified and publishing an “enemies list” of so-called “members of the Executive Branch deep state†that he vows to target, Patel also pleaded the Fifth to avoid implicating himself in crimes during grand jury testimony regarding his role in Trump’s theft of thousands of pages of highly classified national security documents; was paid $25,000 by Russian propagandists to appear in an anti-FBI documentary series; appears to have millions of dollars linked to Chinese interests through shell corporations in the Cayman Islands; and, according to whistleblower allegations cited by the Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, appears to have committed perjury during his Senate confirmation hearing.
Other than that, he sounds like the perfect choice for FBI Director! Donald Trump has done it again! Did I mention Patel also publicly vowed, as recently as last December, to “come after” journalists “who lied about American citizens, who helped Joe Biden rig Presidential elections”? (So much for the First Amendment, even if Patel remains a fan of the Fifth.)
THEN… Speaking of the First Amendment and protection of the free press, we recently reported on the Trump White House’s attempt to violate the First Amendment by barring the Associated Press from White House events unless and until the 178-year old international media organization agreed to change its Style Guide to refer to the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of America”.
On the surface, it seems like a pretty minor fight, given everything else the Constitutional order is up against. But, upon closer examination, it really is fight over basic Constitutional rights. As NYTimes‘ opinion writer Jamelle Bouie accurately characterized it at Bluesky, “your willingness to accept this gulf of america nonsense is an indication of your willingness to accept much worse things coming from this administration.”
Meanwhile, over The Atlantic, Senior Editor Gilad Edelman doesn’t have any such concerns, and even appears to be victim-blaming by suggesting the fight is one that “the AP probably should never have picked in the first place.”
That brief article by Edelman recently touched off our guest today, longtime media critic, political strategist and writer, JAMISON FOSER, who wonders, in a recent article, who Edelman thinks he is to decide which fights are worth waging in the Trump Era and which are not.
“I think the nature of the situation that we’re in,” Foser tells me today, “and the breadth and depth of the ways that we are in trouble, and things are stacked against us — an autocratic movement has control of our entire government, much of the news media, much of the ways that people get information online — things are really stacked against us.”
“We are not in a situation in which there are obvious, clear, easily discernible, winnable fights we can choose. So this idea that people should only choose fights that they can win — I think people should choose the fights that feel right to them. We should all be doing a little less trying to police what fights other people are choosing to engage in, and more finding a place where we can stand up and pick a fight where we can,” he argues.
“We will probably lose it,” he concedes, “because we will probably lose most of them. But sometimes in the loss there is some value. In this one [AP’s defense of First Amendment freedoms] there is some value. There’s value in saying, ‘We can’t stop Donald Trump from ordering his government to refer to the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America. But we can say we are not going along with that. It is racist, and dumb, and he can’t make us say it. There’s value in saying that to ourselves, in not giving in to his attempt to control the English language. And there’s value in showing our fellow Americans that we are not going along with that.”
In AP’s case, all they were doing was following the Style Guide they have used for decades. And Edelman still characterized it as a “fight” they “should never have picked.”
We’ve got much more to discuss along those lines today with Foser — including how elected Democrats might wage more productive fights — in what I think is a really interesting conversation. Please give it a listen.
FINALLY… Desi Doyen joins us for our latest Green News Report, covering the heroic senior DoJ official who quit this week rather than violate the law by following Trump Admin orders to claw back money lawfully granted to clean energy initiatives under Biden; climate change now tripling the price of coffee and cocoa; and Trump declaring himself ‘King’ to cancel New York City’s very successful, first-in-the-nation congestion pricing…
(Snail mail support to “Brad Friedman, 7095 Hollywood Blvd., #594 Los Angeles, CA 90028” always welcome too!)
|
… the … “Gulp of Amurka” … make Amurka gulp again …
The Onion is about to sue Trump for making it hard to say things funnier than what he says.