On today’s BradCast, we’re sending up a warning flare, a red flag, hoping to raise your attention to the very troubling plans by Democrats to begin the use of online voting, in some form, along with their 2020 Presidential caucuses next year! [Audio link to show is posted at end of article.]
But first, It was a very dark day in New Zealand on Friday, as a white supremacist unleashed a terror attack on two Muslim mosques in Christchurch, killing at least 49 in the massacre, with dozens still in the hospital, many in critical condition. But it was a much brighter day elsewhere around the globe as inspiring “school strikes” took place in more than 100 cities, with children walking out of class to march in protest for action on climate change from the South Pacific to the edge of the arctic circle, from San Francisco to D.C., from Spain to Berlin, from Africa to Poland and beyond.
Hundreds of thousands of young protesters inspired by 16-year old Swedish activist Greta Thunberg — who began her own solitary school strike last year and is now nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize — took to the streets, demanding immediate action from politicians to help save all of our futures by curbing man-made fossil fuel emissions which, as scientists have warned for decades, are dangerously warming the global climate and speeding the planet toward catastrophic danger.
Then — in hopes of replacing ineffective politicians and climate science deniers — we move to U.S. elections, where even Rightwingers (at least some of them) in Georgia now understand the perils of touchscreen computer Ballot Marking Devices. The rightwing group FreedomWorks has joined the fight against BMDs in the Peach State, where vote-suppressing Republican Governor and former Sec. of State Brian Kemp has lobbied state legislators hard to replace the state’s 17-year old, easily-hacked, oft-failed 100 percent unverifiable touchscreen voting system with all new unverifiable touchscreen BMD systems at a cost of at least $150 million.
The bill to enact this boondoggle, HR316, will see one more vote for approval in Georgia’s House before it’s sent to the Governor’s desk. Today, we share some of the lobbying efforts against the measure by Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer who is, believe it or not, a cybersecurity expert and National Security Advisor for Trump 2020. He is calling for hand-marked paper ballots in Georgia and in other states — such as Pennsylvania, Ohio, New Jersey, Delaware, Texas, Kansas and California — where county election officials are handing millions to private voting system vendors for unverifiable, unnecessary systems that cybersecurity and voting system experts strongly warn against.
Finally — speaking of unheeded warnings — we are joined today by STEVEN ROSENFELD of the Independent Media Foundation’s Voting Booth project, to sound the alarm about the Democratic National Committee’s new requirement for caucus states to implement some form of remote voting during their 2020 nomination contests.
The new mandate is part of DNC reforms adopted last year, following the disastrous 2016 Presidential election when cyberattacks and the release of stolen emails undermined both Party leadership and Hillary Clinton’s campaign. While last year’s Party reforms urge states to move from caucus systems run by private state parties to primary elections managed instead by state and county election officials, the new requirement to allow access to caucuses for those who cannot attend in person has left state Democratic Parties looking toward various forms of online, telephonic and smartphone voting options to enact in conjunction with in-person caucusing.
Rosenfeld is currently one of the very few journalist reporting on the disturbing potential plans by Democrats in Iowa, Nevada and elsewhere to contract with private companies for some form of online caucus voting. “It’s part of having the party be more inclusive and participatory,” he tells me, cautioning “It’s not clear how it’s going to be done. This is all being developed right now.” And, he warns, “vendors themselves will do this stuff for next to nothing to try to show proof of concept.”
Of course, that proof of concept will be in a live, Presidential caucus election! He details just some of the many disastrous and chaotic past efforts at such schemes that “didn’t go so well” — colossal online voting failures by the Utah GOP in 2016 and 2018, stolen or corrupted online party elections in Canada, for example — in hopes of warning about what could very well be a looming disaster waiting for Democrats in caucus states next year.
Rosenfeld says he’s been speaking with Democratic officials “trying to let people know what they’re headed into,” and says, “I don’t think they were aware — the Democrats that I talked to on the DNC — of these other examples” of failed elections using this new, largely untested technology.
But with already-complicated caucus systems, 20 or so candidates who could be on the ballot, and the most important election of our lives hanging in the balance, what could possibly go wrong with the addition of new, untested remote voting schemes added to the mix? Now might be a very good time to start paying attention to some of the disturbing answers to that troubling question…
CLICK TO LISTEN OR DOWNLOAD SHOW!…
[audio:http://bradblog.com/audio/BradCast_BradFriedman_GlobalClimateSchoolStrikes_StevenRosenfeld-2020DemOnlineCaucuses_031519.mp3]
(Snail mail support to “Brad Friedman, 7095 Hollywood Blvd., #594 Los Angeles, CA 90028” always welcome too!)
|
“On today’s BradCast, we’re sending up a warning flare, a red flag, hoping to raise your attention to the very troubling plans by Democrats to begin the use of online voting, in some form, along with their 2020 Presidential caucuses next year!” – Brad
Perhaps they will be so “bipartisan” that they will use Trump Voting Machine company products (China Gives Ivanka Trademark On Voting Machines).
Indeed. How do people come up with this stuff? Do they sit around in a circle and whoever pulls the dumbest idea out of a hat wins?