On today’s BradCast the fights over bullets and ballots both continue following the massacre in Orlando over the weekend and the official end of primary voting following Tuesday’s Democratic Primary in Washington D.C. [Audio link for show posted below.]
First up today, the Democratic response to the horrific mass shooting in Orlando seems to be to revise legislative initiatives repeatedly rejected by the NRA and GOP in years past. Both President Obama and Hillary Clinton call for measures to keep suspected terrorists from easily buying semi-automatic weapons of mass destruction, and Dems in the U.S. Senate stage a ‘filibuster’ in hopes of forcing Republicans to allow votes on some of the most low-hanging-fruit gun safety legislation.
In the meantime, some Republicans, at least on Fox “News” (believe it or not), are finally calling for the enactment of some common sense measures, and even Donald Trump is set to meet with the terrorist-enabling NRA concerning their years long fight to assure that those who the U.S. Government will not allow to board an airplane can still easily purchase all of the assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines they may want.
Then, voting in the 2016 Presidential Primary season mercifully came to end with yesterday’s Democratic Primary in Washington D.C. where Clinton reportedly defeated Bernie Sanders by more than 50 points before the pair held a two-hour long private meeting about the future of the party, after the close of polls. But the attempt to oversee the tallying, particularly here in California, where hundreds of thousands of Vote-by-Mail and Provisional ballots remain to be tallied, continues.
With a warning from the “U.N.” that Donald Trump may be just months away from acquiring nuclear weapons, we open the phone lines to listeners on all of the above, before finally finishing up with our latest Green News Report. Listen up, spread the word and keep up the good fight!
CLICK TO LISTEN OR DOWNLOAD SHOW!…
[audio:http://bradblog.com/audio/BradCast_BradFriedman_OrlandoLegislation_CA-DCPrimary_061516.mp3]
(Snail mail support to “Brad Friedman, 7095 Hollywood Blvd., #594 Los Angeles, CA 90028” always welcome too!)
|
How is it that a bartender can be sued for negligence if s/he sells alcohol to a drunk patron and that patron goes and gets in a DUI accident. Bartenders have the right to refuse a patron. Why can’t a gun retailer be able to assess a patron of his/her shop and with background checks can determine if they are a worthy customer. If they don’t refuse and their weapon is used in a rampage by the customer the guns were sold to, the retailer can be sued. How is a gun less lethal than alcohol mixed with an automobile? How are gun sales less liable/negligent?