“I am not a victim,” Catherine Engelbrecht, founder of the Rightwing voter suppression group calling themselves “True the Vote” told members of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday morning. It was an odd turn of phrase given all that came before it in her testimony, both written and oral, at the confirmation hearings for U.S. Attorney General-nominee Loretta Lynch.
“I’m here today because I was targeted by the government for daring to speak out,” the non-victim informed the Senators and those watching via C-Span at the very top of her remarks, much of which followed her written testimony [PDF] submitted in advance, and much of which did not. She is, she explained, just “one of thousands of Americans who have become living examples of a kind of trickle down tyranny that is actively endorsed by the current Administration and rigorously enforced by the Department of Justice.”
“Over the years it has become clear to me that they don’t just want True the Vote shut down, they want me broken,” Engelbrecht wrote dramatically, but, for some reason, didn’t say during her spoken testimony [video posted at the end of this article].
But, remember, she is “not a victim” at all. She is, on the other hand, the head of a wingnut Tea Party grifter organization which has, as we described in detail earlier this week, stepped on one rake after another since its ignominious appearance on the “voting rights” scene in 2010 when, in their introductory video, the group included a Photoshopped photo of an African-American woman holding a sign at a protest reading: “I ONLY GOT TO VOTE ONCE!” Another faked sign behind her head read “I’M WITH STUPID.” (In actuality, as the original photos from a protest during the Presidential election theft in Florida in 2000 show, the woman’s sign read: “DON’T MESS WITH OUR VOTES.” The sign behind her had read “Gore/Lieberman 2000.”)
During her testimony, Engelbrecht, after years of faking voter fraud statistics to try and help the GOP case for polling place Photo ID restrictions, even had the temerity to describe her organization as “a national non-profit initiative to protect voters’ rights and promote election integrity.”
Faking the truth seems to come easy to Engelbrecht and her group, as they’ve spent years attempting to intimidate voters at the polls under the guise of protecting against pretend Democratic “voter fraud”. At the Senate hearing on Thursday, however, it was often what she didn’t say during her oral testimony, as contrasted with her written testimony submitted beforehand, that may have been most revealing.
For some reason, for example, she — or, perhaps a staffer on the new Republican-majority Senate committee — must have thought it better not to discuss “pigment of skin” in polite company at the confirmation hearings for the first African-American woman to be nominated as the nation’s chief law enforcement official. That part didn’t make it into to Engelbrecht’s spoken outrage…
Last September, when current AG Eric Holder announced his plans to resign after a successor was sworn in, True the Vote released a statement quoting Engelbrecht blasting what she described as the first African-American AG’s “radical, racialist assault on voters’ rights across America.”
“Engelbrecht has called voter protection efforts ‘race baiting,’ an attempt to ‘exact racial justice on their presumed enemies,’ and even called Attorney General Holder’s defense of the freedom to vote a ‘radical, racialist assault on voting rights,'” ColorOfChange.org’s Executive Director Rashad Robinson said prior to the hearings. “These remarks should prohibit her from testifying on an expert panel to confirm the first black female AG.”
But the remarks didn’t prohibit her from testifying. In fact, they arguably may have helped win Engelbrecht her ticket to be an “expert witness” in the U.S. Senate on Thursday, where, according to her written testimony, she was prepared to repeat the “radical, racialist” charge. That part, however, didn’t make it into her oral testimony, it seems.
Engelbrecht — “not a victim”, remember — spent the bulk of her time speaking to what she believes is a conspiracy by the federal government to destroy her. Since filing for a tax exemption as a supposed non-partisan, non-profit organization, she explained, the government has been relentless in its assault against her.
“Since those filings in 2010, my private businesses, my non-profit organizations, and I personally, have been subjected to more than fifteen instances of audit, inquiry, or investigation by federal agencies, including; the IRS, OSHA, ATF, and the FBI.”
She didn’t explain if any of those supposed inquiries and investigations (she described them as an “inquisition” during her oral testimony) had anything to do with the time True the Vote polling place observers were denied access to precincts by every member, both Republican and Democratic, of the Franklin County, Ohio Board of Elections after it was determined that the group had forged signatures on the permission forms. Or maybe federal authorities wanted to chat with Engelbrecht about the time the NAACP Houston branch accused the Houston-based TTV of having “attacked” volunteers for legally assisting disabled and elderly voters at the polls.
The NAACP was forced to release a statement about True the Vote, who they described as “a right wing extremist group”, on Election Day 2012, after they said TTV’s poll watchers attacked “volunteer poll monitors for handing out water to voters at Early Vote locations and for assisting Disabled and Elderly voters by standing in line for them or asking younger people in line to let the elderly and disabled go ahead of them in the line to vote.”
Perhaps that was one of the reasons the FBI wanted to talk to Engelbrecht? She didn’t mention that incident one way or another to the U.S. Senators via either written or oral testimony when she described the “government subterfuge” that has been unleashed against her.
Engelbrecht didn’t tell the Senators, as she had prepared to in her written testimony, that “absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Instead, she asked at that point in her remarks: “Is there the will to ever get to truth behind this nightmare of citizen targeting?”
Part of that “citizen targeting”, no doubt, includes the time last year when revered, conservative, Reagan-appointed federal appeals court Judge Richard Posner described True the Vote’s “evidence” of massive Democratic voter fraud as “downright goofy, if not paranoid.”
While there is no evidence that Rightwing con-artist groups like True the Vote were targeted in some sort of criminal political conspiracy by Holder or Obama or the IRS (which should have targeted such scam operations, of any political bent, for taking advantage of the tax-code for partisan purposes), once Engelbrecht finished explaining her non-victim status as a victim of virtually every Executive Branch agency, she moved on to her real passion: pretend “voter fraud” and the fight to ensure some 20 million legally registered American voters lose their right to vote for the crime of not owning one of a handful of state-issued photo IDs that Republicans find acceptable for voting.
But with ACORN now out of business — the community organization targeted for years by the Right, including Engelbrecht who decried them in TTV’s introductory video, even as she was unable to cite any actual evidence of voter fraud by the group when we asked for it in 2010 (because none actually exists) — “voter fraud” fraudsters need fresh villains. And Engelbrecht has found them in “illegal aliens” who are, apparently, “flooding” government agencies to register to vote.
Well, the depth of that “flood” may depend on whether one examines her written or oral testimony. The facts of the matter seem to have changed somewhat between the time Engelbrecht submitted her written version, when “Drivers License Offices” were “being flooded with new requests” by non-citizens “registering in droves” to vote, and the time the words actually came out of her mouth in the Senate hearing room, when the concern had subsided to only a “coming influx of illegal aliens”…
As written:
As spoken:
With the illegal alien voting situation somewhat less dire, apparently, than she had previously thought, perhaps the “complete chaos” she had also originally predicted — or hoped to incite — wasn’t as appropriate for her closing remarks.
What she said, as seemingly ripped straight from the gullet of every Fox “News” pundit, was this:
We have replaced rule of law with moral relativism. We have replaced truth with political correctness. And in all of the double-speak and double-think, we have become increasingly unsteady about how we the people factor in to a future left into the hands of our current leaders.
What she had originally planned to say, or warn, or threaten, as revealed in her written testimony, is this:
So writes the messenger…Who is totally not a victim.
Engelbrecht’s written testimony is here [PDF]. Her actual testimony before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee on 1/29/2015 follows below…
Previous coverage of True the Vote by The BRAD BLOG:
9/22/2010: “Houston Voting Machine Fire Update and Shouting ‘Voter Fraud’ in a Crowded Midterm Election”
11/6/2012: “True the Fraudsters: Rightwing ‘True the Vote’ Forged Pollwatcher Applications in Ohio”
11/6/2012: “Houston NAACP: ‘True the Vote’ ‘Attacking’ Volunteers for Giving Water to Voters in Line”
12/10/2012: “‘True the Vote’ Fakes the ‘Voter Fraud'”
11/14/2013: “U.S. Government Opposes Motion By Right Wing ‘True the Vote’ to Intervene in TX Photo ID Case”
12/16/2013: “Federal Court Denies ‘True the Vote’ Attempt to Intervene in Texas Photo ID Restriction Law Case”
12/20/2013: “Disgraced Former Members of Bush Justice Department Challenge Order Denying ‘True the Vote’ Intervention in Texas Photo ID Case”
10/11/2014: “Reagan-Appointed Federal Judge Who Approved First Photo ID Law in 2008 Writes Devastating Dissent AGAINST Photo ID Voting Restrictions”
11/6/2014: “Rightwing ‘Voter Integrity’ Group ‘True the Vote’ Fails To Find Polling Place ‘Voter Fraud’ (Again)”
1/26/2015: “Senate Repubs Call Founder of Fake ‘Voter Fraud’ Group to Testify at Real AG Nomination Hearings”
(Snail mail support to “Brad Friedman, 7095 Hollywood Blvd., #594 Los Angeles, CA 90028” always welcome too!)
|









Brad: The video you posted includes only Englebrech reading her prepared testimony. Do you know whether any Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats questioned her about
TrueSkew the Vote’s sordid record?Ernie –
There was some questioning after her prepared statement from Leahy, though, sadly, my audio recording seems to have failed ONLY during those questions. The (terribly sympathetic) colloquies between her and several Republicans, including Grassley (now chair of the Judiciary Committee) and Hatch, are briefly characterized in Digby’s piece on the testimony today.
Haven’t had the chance to look around elsewhere for better recording of the post-statement questioning yet (I’m sure it’s available at CSpan) but if you’d like me to post what audio I have here for that, just let me know and I’ll post it for ya.
Brad: If you come across a video that includes anything remotely containing tough questioning by Democrats on the Judiciary Committee, please post it.
If there were none, given advance notice that Englebrech would appear, it would demonstrate an epic failure by Committee Democrats to adequately prepare for this hearing.
The best way for Democrats to discourage Republican efforts to utilize the likes of Englebrech as supposed “experts” is to confront such “witnesses” with the hard truth!
Ernie –
You can check out the entire video, and move through it by searching the transcript, etc. at CSpan right here.
There were 9 witnesses on the panel in all (including Engelbrecht, Attkisson and a number of other clowns and non-clowns) and none of them actually objected to Loretta Lynch’s nomination. The ones called by the GOP were all there only to complain about Holder. Some of them strongly supported Lynch. None objected. So it was theater. And silly theater at that.
I don’t find any questioning of Engelbrecht by Dems with a quick search through the tape. Though I may have missed something.
But, if you’d like your head to explode, go to 03:12:30 in the full tape at the link above and check out the Kabuki theater about North Carolina’s voter suppression law during the “questioning” between Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) and Engelbrecht. 🙂
What? They didn’t want to question any fake pimps?
It’s not so much that Democrats are dropping the ball on opportunities to expose Republican tricks to control elections in their favor, it’s that they don’t even want the ball. That became clear when they were passing HAVA, and the ACORN farce.
I’m going to TRY to watch Mike Lee’s take, but it’s going to be hard. I have a good friend who knows a lot of republicans and he assures me they are all embarrassed by Mr. Lee, but you can bet he’s going to win again when he runs.
Hmmm.
Whether they supported the Lynch nomination, opposed it or ignored it is of no moment.
The GOP utilized this nomination as a platform for disguising their voter suppression project as an effort to preserve the integrity of the vote.
Senate Judiciary Democrats should be prepared to expose the farce in whatever context it arises. Instead, as Larry Bergan points out @5, they appear to have rolled over, again, just as they did with the GOP’s fabricated anti-ACORN smear campaign.
Maybe Mike Lee won’t win election next time after all. I just found out that one of the republicans embarrassed by him is John Huntsman Jr.’s dad, who is the richest man in Utah.
I heard Huntsman is upset that Lee isn’t pro-business enough. 🙁
It’s really hard to believe this subject is so important(as those of us here do), and has been so critical ever since the first Bush “selection,” and still so few give a fuck about it. The democrats seem to give as little a fuck as anybody. I suspect it just may be true that the primary concern of those in power in D.C. is just holding onto their own seats. And since the system seems to be “working” for them, they are not highly motivated to look at it. And of course, there are multiple other reasons why our obsession of choice is about as popular a cause as Native Americans. Leonard Peltier is still in jail. And we’re still using unverifiable voting. Go America. We’re number stupid.
I actually find many genuine conservative approaches are viable (having seen them put into practice vs depending on government. However, what Republicans practice is more along the lines of Psychopathism and Corporate-welfare-Socialism (benefactors include Koch Bros.) than genuine conservatism.
The punch card system that some states have been we’ve been using since the late 70’s were designed to count exit polls, not actual voting. Somehow, the state leaders that started using them for voting weren’t any more concerned about them, then they were the Diebold incarnations.
This problem could have started way before Bush stole the presidency in 2000. Isn’t it funny how, Utahn’s stopped voting for Democrats in the 80’s and never looked back. The Deseret News editorial board here called Paul Wyrich “a guiding light” when he died in 2008.
Presently, there’s no law against wearing tin foil hats though and I’m one of them when it comes to voting in Utah.
Larry Bergen said @ 10:
They were? Where did you hear that? (Not challenging you, just had never heard that before.)
For the record, I don’t think anybody is using punch card systems anymore for voting. The closest, to my knowledge, would be here in L.A. where we converted the punchcard system to an ink system. Same little card into a template/booklet, but instead of punching it through, the stylus puts an ink dot on the ballot instead of punching it.
Brad:
I read that in a paper written by somebody about the history of the Votomatic a long time ago, but I can’t find it, although I’m sure I linked to it here somewhere. I have been looking around, and I was wrong that it was being designed only for exit polls. The paper said that IBM was developing the machine and it probably said that they were testing it in exit polls, but got cold feet and sold the machine rights to another organization
That part is true. IBM was developing it to use in elections, but got some heavy criticism and they decided to dump it. This part of an interview with the inventor of the Votomatic verifies why IBM sold the division. The entire interview starts here.
Interestingly, the inventor was testing the machine in actual elections in the early 60’s before selling to IBM.
Around the time I found that paper, I had read a warning about the Votomatic, written long ago, saying it could be programmed by radio. That also seems to be true, if you look at one of the machines that was used to count the punchcards. Go to the bottom of this page. That sure looks like an antenna sticking up to me.
I shouldn’t be so paranoid, but Utahn’s voting only for Republicans hasn’t been the norm since the Mormons got here. I went through all the governors we’ve had and although there are a majority of Republican governors there, it wasn’t as skewed as today. In fact we had two Democratic governors in a row, just before the Republicans had a 30 year reign starting in 1985.
Dammit Brad! I’m a former optician, not a journalist!
Democracy’s gold standard is the ONLY way to vote. Let’s stop with the nonsense.
We can do it!