Over the last 48 hours or so, during which time I’ve been largely off the grid on jury duty, the story of wife-beating U.S. District Court Judge Mark Fuller has finally taken off in the corporate media, as well as among a number of the elected officials who would be responsible for impeaching the 2002 George W. Bush lifetime-appointee to the federal bench.
I couldn’t be happier to finally be playing catch-up on this story for a change, as calls for accountability for the federal judge from Alabama’s Middle District have now become a “virtual chorus” over these last few days. The state’s Governor, as well as both of Alabama’s U.S. Senators and its entire Congressional delegation, save for one member (Rep. Mike Rogers), have now called for Fuller’s resignation and/or impeachment.
His resignation, however, and arguably his impeachment, would be far too generous for Fuller, as I’ll discuss below, given previous allegations — by his first wife — that mirror what we now know about him, concerning drug and alcohol abuse, as well as physical abuse of both the first wife and their children…
Corporate media and members of Congress finally notice
On Wednesday, MSNBC’s All in with Chris Hayes finally devoted an entire segment to the outrageous case which we first reported back in early August, just after Fuller had been arrested for beating his wife bloody at the Ritz-Carlton in Atlanta. He was arrested by Atlanta Police following a 911 call from his second wife Kelli, during which she is heard being struck, asks for an ambulance, and implores the dispatcher: “Please help me. He’s beating on me.”
Just weeks later, Atlanta prosecutors — perhaps not knowing about almost identical allegations of abuse by Fuller’s previous wife Lisa in 2012, in documents that were mysteriously sealed during their divorce proceedings — allowed Fuller to enter a pre-trial diversion program, requiring a few weeks of domestic abuse counseling to avoid prosecution and, if successfully completed, have his entire arrest record expunged as if nothing ever happened.
The plan — which a senior Republican federal judge described last week as “a sweet deal…that will allow him to erase his criminal conviction for beating the crap out of his wife in a fancy hotel room while reeking with booze” — would allow Fuller to return to his lifetime $200,000/year job where he sits in judgment of others, while leaving his next victim, whoever that might be, with little if any protection.
Early this week, Hayes played a portion of the chilling audio from the 911 call during which Fuller’s wife is heard being repeatedly struck in their hotel room. On Wednesday night, Hayes played the horrifying audio again during a segment covering the then-new calls for Fuller’s resignation — finally — from powerful Alabama Senator Richard Shelby (R) (who nominated Fuller to the bench 12 years ago) and the state’s junior Senator Jeff Sessions (R), among others in the state’s Congressional delegation. The sudden outcry, sparked only after outrage over the NFL/Ray Rice domestic violence controversy, leads one of Hayes’ guests, Alabama Media Group journalist Chuck Dean, to speculate that it’s just “a matter of time”, before Fuller finally steps down…
After just eight days in session, follow a five-week long Summer recess, Congress has now adjourned until after the November mid-term elections. So, while impeachment of federal judges, the only way to force him or her out their job if they don’t step down on their own, is always difficult, such proceedings couldn’t even begin until much later this year, if at all.
Given the additional information we have about Fuller, however, above and beyond what we know about him beating his current wife bloody in that Atlanta hotel room last month, resignation without further penalty would be a gift, as would impeachment, for that matter.
Impeachment
“If Congress impeaches federal judge Mark Fuller following last month’s domestic violence arrest, he will become only the 12th judge in U.S. history to be removed in that fashion and the first from Alabama,” writes AL.com’s Kent Faulk.
Impeachment for a federal judge requires charges filed in the U.S. House followed by conviction in the U.S. Senate. As Faulk explains:
But of those 15 judges who were impeached by the U.S. House, four of them were later acquitted during the trial before the U.S. Senate and kept their jobs. Of the 11 others who were impeached, three resigned before the Senate trial.
…
…But none of those judges have been impeached resulting from charges of domestic violence.
…
One of the last judges to be impeached was Samuel B. Kent, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
He was impeached by the U.S. House on June 19, 2009, on charges of sexual assault, obstructing and impeding an official proceeding, and making false and misleading statements, according to the Federal Judicial Center. He resigned 11 days later.
I’ve seen conflicting information about whether or not Fuller would be allowed to receive a pension if he resigned. Some have said he would only be entitled to benefits if he was allowed to retire. According to a quick read of the U.S. Code’s Title 28, Chapter 17 on “Resignation and Retirement of Justices and Judges” of the U.S. Code, however, retirement appears to be allowed only after at least 15 years of service, at the age of 65 or older. Fuller is 55, and has served on the bench for only 12 years. Some members of Congress have suggested, however, that, short of impeachment, Fuller would be allowed to receive benefits for life, if he resigns. Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf, in a blistering blog item condemning Fuller, suggests a deal could be struck with the Chief Judge of the 11th Circuit and the Circuit’s Judicial Council to “Pay him forever as an inducement to resign”. Kopf says that 28 U.S.C. § 354(a)(2)(A)(ii-iii) & § 354(a)(2)(B)(ii) “gives them that leverage.”
So, if allowed to resign and receive such a pay off, Fuller would be getting a great deal. Impeachment is certainly the appropriate course of action here, but that is very difficult under any circumstances, much less this particular Congress. It’s also, much better than he appears to deserve.
Repeat Offender
But Fuller is not necessarily off the hook for prosecution in a court of law yet. The terms of his plea deal, reportedly, require that, in addition to attending once-a-week domestic abuse counseling for 24 weeks, Judge Fuller must also receive an evaluation concerning drug and alcohol abuse by a court-approved entity.
If he successfully completes those requirements, only then will his arrest record be permanently expunged.
Fuller’s attorney, after the plea deal was approved in state court with the consent of Fuller’s wife Kelli, the victim in this case, stated that the federal judge “doesn’t have a drug or alcohol problem and never has.”
That, like the claim that he is a first time offender in regard to domestic abuse, does not appear to be true, at least according to Fuller’s first wife Lisa who filed a damning Request for Admissions during their 2012 divorce, after Fuller was allegedly discovered to have been having an affair with his court bailiff, Kelli, who he eventually married (and subsequently beat the hell out of last month, after she similarly accused him of having an affair with his law clerk.)
According to the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press in 2012, the first wife, Lisa Boyd Fuller, “submitted an objection to her husband’s motion to seal their divorce file…She agreed to redact certain sensitive information but ‘strenuously object[ed] to sealing the entire file,’ according to her response. Her initial complaint and request for admissions accuse Fuller of extramarital affairs, domestic violence and prescription drug abuse.”
Despite the objections from his first wife, the court agreed to seal the record at the time, which is unusual, according to legal expert Scott Horton of Harper’s, who wrote: “It’s an obviously improper decision, particularly because Mrs. Fuller rejected to the sealing of the file. For the file to be sealed, over the objection of one party, is unusual.”
While the claims contained in Lisa Fuller’s April 20, 2012 Request for Admissions are only allegations, we are not able to see how Judge Fuller responded to them, thanks to that portion of the record becoming sealed. However, in 2012, Alabama journalist Roger Shuler was able to obtain and publish Mrs. Fuller’s Request for Admissions and it is damning, disturbing, and apparently completely ignored by the Atlanta prosecutors and court which both appear ready to let Judge Fuller off the hook with far less than a slap on the wrist.
The document contains disturbing references to alcohol and prescription drug abuse and sexual impropriety, as well as physical abuse of both the first Mrs. Fuller and their children.
Here are the bullet points from that document [emphasis added], since these earlier allegations have, to date, been seemingly ignored by both authorities in Atlanta who are letting him off the hook, and elected officials who seems as if they’ll be happy with his little more than his resignation…
When Judge Fuller sentenced Alabama’s former Democratic Governor Don Siegelman to federal prison — on charges that 113 bipartisan former state Attorneys General contend had never been a crime before the popular Democratic Governor was charged by partisan federal prosecutors with them — he didn’t allow Siegelman to go free pending appeal, as is the usual custom in such cases.
“You and I both took an oath to uphold the law,” Fuller declared from the bench to Siegelman, with whom he held a long time grudge. “You have violated that oath,” the judge said in 2007, before ordering Siegelman shackled in leg irons and shuffled off to jail for 6.5 years. The unusually harsh treatment by the former Karl Rove client turned federal judge, appointed by Rove’s then boss in the White House, was meted out, Fuller said, because as a public official, the Governor had to be held to a higher standard.
No such higher standard has been applied, to date, to Mark Fuller, despite a record of what appears to be repeated domestic abuse. He has been held to no standard at all, in fact.
Given the allegations in his own now-sealed divorce records with his first wife — allegations that appear to mirror almost precisely what we now know about the more recent abuse of his second wife — Judge Fuller would be lucky to escape with only impeachment, much less resignation. The evidence now on the record concerning U.S. District Court Judge Mark Fuller strongly suggests he should be in jail, before he can hurt — or kill — even one more victim.
Recently related previous stories at The BRAD BLOG:
• 8/11/2014: “Federal Judge in Don Siegelman Case Arrested, Charged with Abusing Wife in Atlanta Hotel”
• 8/25/2014: “Federal Judge Who Was Arrested for Beating His Wife (and Who Sentenced Don Siegelman) Is Now Hoping to Avoid Prosecution Altogether”
• 9/5/2014: “BREAKING: Federal Judge Who Presided Over Siegelman Case and Who Recently Beat His Own Wife Bloody Strikes Deal to Avoid Prosecution”
• 9/10/2014: “NFL’s Ray Rice Loses Job for Knocking Out Wife, Federal Judge Mark Fuller Keeps Lifetime Appointment After Beating Wife Bloody”
• 9/15/2014: “Republican Senior Federal Judge, Domestic Abuse Experts Call for Accountability for Wife-Beating U.S. District Court Judge Mark Fuller”
• 9/15/2014: “Wife-Beating Federal Judge Mark Fuller Finally Mentioned on MSNBC [VIDEO]”
• 9/17/2014:“Chris Hayes Plays Horrifying 911 Call From Federal Judge Mark Fuller’s Wife; Sounds of Her Apparently Being Struck Can Be Clearly Heard”
A little off topic, but this kind of item is why I come to the Brad Blog every day. Things that ought to be addressed by the corporate media but aren’t, or (like this one) very late in the game. Thank you, Brad.
Thank you, Ralph. Greatly appreciate that.
I’m going to make a comment that will probably be met with some ire.
Fuller is a schmuck. Obviously, a violent and abusive schmuck.
Is there anyone out there who thinks that Kelli Fuller, given the circumstances of her relationship with the judge and the juxtaposition of his former wife, might maybe have expected, if she’d had a brain in her head, that something bad might come out of this???
Don’t get me wrong, there is nothing about this situation that is Kelli Fuller’s “fault”. Mark Fuller is a scumbag extraordinaire. My question is how is it that she thought her circumstance would end up any different than Lisa Fuller’s?
Someone help me with the psychology of this whole thing. I’m a “good” guy. Never hit a woman in my life. Never wanted to. Never understood why any woman would tolerate even the slightest air of oppression, intimidation, or abuse – for herself OR ANY OTHER WOMAN. Furthermore, I am raising my daughter (now 6th grade, holy shit) to not take any of that crap from any guy ever. I have two sisters who were both in abusive relationships and I have yet to fathom why they waited so long to get out.
Meanwhile, the GOP continues to vote down equal pay
…and I continue to be befuddled, because my sisters are both Republicans.
I was disappointed to see in the coverage of the Fuller case, even by “liberal” MSNBC, that his role in the Siegelman affair was not touched on at all. I consider that aspect of the story to be an essential part of the narrative, given the way the former Governor was treated, versus the kid glove treatment Fuller has been given for a REAL, violent offense.
One caveat, Brad.
While the request for admissions reflect the allegations that were being made by the first wife, you would need Fuller’s sworn “responses” to those requests for admissions in order to know which allegations he contested and which, if any, he was willing to admit were true.
While the belated attention within the MSM and calls for Fuller’s impeachment are refreshing, if such proceedings are to take place, they should, by no means. be limited to issues of domestic violence.
Fuller impeachment proceedings can and should include a thorough investigation of Fuller’s role in the Karl Rove-engineered political “persecution“* of former Gov. Don Siegelman.
*I use the word “persecution” as opposed to “prosecution” because the latter implies that what transpired in the Siegelman case entailed a form of “law” enforcement.
Recall that you previously covered the letter submited by retired Federal Judge U.W. Clemon to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder.
Judge Clemon, to whom the Siegelman case was initially assigned, alleged that federal prosecutors engaged in jury-pool “poisoning” and “judge-shopping” in Siegelman’s case after he initially threw it out. Declarations filed on Siegelman’s behalf also alleged that the prosecutors “coached” and “cajoled” a former Siegelman aide by offering a lighter sentence to the aide, and then by withholding that information from the Siegelman defense team.
The failure of the prosecution to inform the defense team violated a long-standing precedent handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court in its 1963 decision, Brady v. Maryland.
The Rove-connected prosecutors succeeded in having the Rove-connected Fuller assigned to the case.
Judge Clemon alleged:
While, as suggested in the body of this article, impeachment for domestic violence may be breaking new legal ground, Fuller’s involvement in a Karl Rove-connected criminal conspiracy to send a innocent man to prison for political gain would clearly meet the Constitutional definition for high crimes and misdomeanors.
Moreover, justice will not be served unless the federal prosecutors who participated in the political persecution of Gov. Siegelman, are removed from office and perhaps, together with Rove and all others involved in the conspiracy, subjected to criminal prosecution. It would also require the immediate release of the former Alabama governor, who should be afforded civil damage remedies against “all” conspirators.
Soul Rebel said @ 3:
No ire, but…
To be fair, we don’t actually know that Kelli knew anything about the circumstances of the previous marriage — at least in regard to physical abuse. Remember that a) Fuller had those records sealed and b) If you were having an affair with someone and they were going through a divorce, would you be reviewing all of their divorce filings in court? I suspect she did not.
That said…
While she might not have known about physical abuse in the previous marriage, she almost certainly knew that Fuller was willing to cheat on his wife (with a co-worker), since she was the one (the co-worker) cheating with him.
So, when the latest incident came up — remember, the fight at the Ritz-Carlton was reportedly over an affair that Fuller was said to be having with his law clerk, Kelli certainly couldn’t be all that surprised, given the Judge’s record on that which she certainly knows about.
Still. That happens all the time with “other” women (and, I suspect, with men as well.)
(And here’s the part where I may be met with ire, even though this is mostly a joke. Ready for it? Here goes.)
The way you describe your sisters, it makes total sense that they are still Republicans.
Ernie said @ 5:
Understood. Which is why I wrote in the article above:
…
Given the allegations in his own now-sealed divorce records with his first wife — allegations that appear to mirror almost precisely what we now know about the more recent abuse of his second wife…
In other words, yes, we don’t know how he responded to the allegations (because he had them sealed), but virtually everything Lisa Fuller mentioned in the Request for Admissions apparently happened again with the second wife Kelli (other than the child abuse, which we have no information either way on). To be specific:
+ In both marriages, Fuller apparently/is alleged to have beaten his wife.
+ In both marriages, Fuller apparently/is alleged to have alcohol probs.
+ In both marriages, Fuller apparently/is alleged to have cheated on the wife with a co-worker.
That’s a whole lotta “coincidences” that the first wife, Lisa, would have had to take a “lucky guess” at two years ago during the divorce proceedings.
Earnest said:
Amen and Amen!
But of course this still leaves us miles away from any light being shed on the danger of the voting machines, which is a huge part of the Siegelman story, which “60 Minutes” decided to leave behind too. This whole thing is so frustrating.
I’m always glad to see BradBlog in my email. Attaway Brad. Glad to see you’re still seeking truth while others (me?) succumb to the beat-downs of life in America… The Gov and the judge should be made to immediately swap places. Wishin’ don’t make it so, alas.
@Soul Rebel (Comment #3): It seems you are sincere in your question. The Huffington Post has run a 6 part series of interviews with survivors of domestic violence called “Why Didn’t You Just Leave?” that tries to shed light on this. Worth a read.