{"id":6261,"date":"2008-08-10T16:12:15","date_gmt":"2008-08-10T23:12:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bradblog.com\/?p=6261"},"modified":"2008-08-11T10:04:55","modified_gmt":"2008-08-11T17:04:55","slug":"daily-voting-news-for-august-09-and-10-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bbnewdb.webbyspice.com\/?p=6261","title":{"rendered":"‘Daily Voting News’ For August 09 and 10, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"

For over two years Election Integrity attorneys have been urging the state of Ohio to file suit against Diebold\/Premier, ES&S, and Hart for failure to meet their contractual obligations with the state. The Secretary of State ignored that urging. It was only after Diebold\/Premier filed suit against the state that the state took action in a countersuit. Rather than being courageous plaintiffs in this case, the state is a defendant and Diebold\/Premier chose the most favorable court to hear the case. If the state had done the right thing two years ago they very well may have had the funds to have gotten rid of all Diebold DREs in the state for this November. Instead counties are still at the mercy of Diebold and their flawed voting systems. And remember, it may be Diebold\/Premier in this case but the other vendors play the same game in different ball parks. They are all complicit. For more on this issue see HERE<\/a>….<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n