NO MEANS NO!: Illinois Passes Bill to Force One Single County to Follow the Law

Share article:

Guest blogged by Jean Kaczmarek, co-chair, Illinois Ballot Integrity Project/DuPage Chapter

On Tuesday, Illinois Ballot Integrity Project (IBIP)/DuPage Chapter celebrated a crucial legislative victory, which will finally force the DuPage County Election Commission to comply with the law before shredding OUR election records.

HB 4051 passed unanimously [PDF] in the Illinois Senate 57-0, finally ending a three-year power struggle regarding the Election Commission’s destruction of OUR public records. Last month, the bill also passed unanimously [PDF] in the Illinois House 117-0. Illinois Governor Pat Quinn is expected to sign the bill into law shortly.

This short, but significant one-page bill, sponsored by IL Rep. Paul Froehlich (D-56th), amends the Illinois Election Code to specify that the destruction of OUR election-related public records must follow the procedures mandated by the Local Records Act. The bill also amends the Local Records Act to specifically include that local election authorities must comply with the provisions of the Act when disposing OUR public records.

HB4051’s provisions have just one county board in mind: the inveterate scofflaws of the DuPage County Election Commission…

* * *

This legislation is necessary overkill. The Local Records Act, enacted in 1985, simply and clearly mandated all government entities within the state to comply with certain procedures prior to destroying OUR public records. The DuPage County Election Commission argued that the Illinois Election Code allowed them to destroy OUR public records, and that the Code superseded the Local Records Act. In over two decades, the Election Commission never complied with the Act.

Meanwhile, other election boards across the state saw no ambiguity and had been regularly complying with the Local Records Act for years, including the Cook County and Chicago election boards.

The more-than-three-year odyssey, leading to the necessity of the new bill, began in January 2006 when IBIP/DuPage had learned at a board meeting that OUR records were about to be destroyed. One of our members suggested we contact the Illinois State Archives to find out if the Election Commission was following proper procedure. We discovered that the Election Commission had never filed for a disposal certificate since the Local Records Act had been enacted requiring such a certificate. Unless the Election Commission had a very large storage room somewhere, capable of secretly storing 20+ years of records, they were in violation of the law. Multiple payments Accurate Document Destruction, Inc., suggested that OUR public records were very likely being destroyed.

Destroying OUR records in Illinois, without complying with the Local Records Act, is a Class 4 felony.

Further, we had strong reason to believe that the Election Commission was destroying OUR election materials prematurely because of contradictory Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) responses. In November 2004, Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org, had FOIAed all jurisdictions nationwide for certain election materials the night of the general election. DuPage County Election Commission Executive Director Robert T. Saar did not respond to the FOIA. Per our request, Harris requested Saar to respond to her original FOIA several months later. Saar finally responded to Harris in March 2005, “…we no longer have the poll tapes being requested there, which are retained statutorily for 60 days following an election.”

Harris would later refer to DuPage County as one of the two “worst places to vote in America,” tied with the notorious Riverside County, CA (as The BRAD BLOG has been documenting for years).

Federal and state election codes mandate that OUR records from a federal election be retained for a minimum of 22 months; Saar’s response to Harris was just five months after the election. In addition, Harris had presented the FOIA on Election Night — well within Saar’s personal “60-day deadline” for preserving records. Payments to Accurate Document Destruction for disposal of large quantities of materials in January 2005, correlate with Saar’s response to Harris. If what Saar stated was true, he and the Election Commission were in violation of federal and state election codes and the Local Records Act.

My IBIP/DuPage co-chair, Melisa Urda and I followed up with our own FOIA request several months later. This time, Saar responded that OUR poll tapes/results slips were “sealed” and “exempt from disclosure.” It still remains a mystery as to which one of Saar’s stories, if either of them, is true.

Learning six months later that the Election Commission had never complied with the Local Records Act prompted us to alert the Illinois Attorney General’s office, who forwarded our complaint to DuPage County State’s Attorney Joe Birkett, self-dubbed as the “Corruption Buster”. We also paid a courtesy call to the media.

Within several months, the Chicago Tribune published a solid piece [PDF] which concluded with a quote from Saar claiming: “A lot of people are mixing apples and oranges…We don’t have to get clearance. The law is very clear about what we can do there. There’s no clearance that we have to get from anbody.”

The article must have shaken up the State’s Attorney’s office because they immediately asked to meet with us. Asst. State’s Attorney Nancy Wolfe informed us that the Election Commission was not guilty of wrongdoing, as they were only required to follow the Election Code, not the Local Records Act, or even the federal law, in order to destroy OUR records. I asked if their office, or an independent third party, had determined whether or not OUR November 2004 election records still existed. The answer was no, they hadn’t bothered to make that determination. I asked if OUR public records, those unrelated to an election, which therefore would not fall under the so-called “perimeters” of the Election Code, had been destroyed. There was no answer.

* * *

We regrouped. In June of 2006, I requested the Local Records Commission of Illinois to seek an opinion from Illinois Attorney Lisa Madigan. The Records Commission was absolutely certain that the DuPage County Election Commission needed to comply with the Local Records Act, and appreciated that we were dealing with cruel and unusual circumstances. Formality was necessary to ensure compliance with the law.

Also that month, I sent a letter to DuPage Chief Judge Ann Jorgensen with copies of letters from the Illinois State Archives and Local Records Commission of Illinois regarding the destruction; she acknowledged short and sweet. I hoped that Jorgensen would serve as an insurance policy to protect OUR records. I was wrong. The Election Commission defiantly revved up the shredder, more payments were made to Accurate Document Destruction.

I must have called 50 law firms and agencies that summer seeking pro bono legal assistance, all to no avail. Most people have at least one fear — heights, elevators, snakes, spiders, etc. Mine is courtrooms. I have nightmares of being chewed out by a cranky old judge. Filing pro se was out of the question. Besides, I knew that I’d be up against a team of taxpayer-paid attorneys well-versed in the hideously burdensome Illinois Election Code, with maybe a Diebold attorney or two thrown into the mix — all determined to keep OUR electoral process anything but open.

Adding insult to injury, Melisa and I learned that huge plastic bins, picked up for destruction, were, until the fall of 2006, stored at United Express Systems in Aurora. This warehouse was owned by Brad Westrom, brother of the former chairman of the Election Commission, Dean Westrom. Brad and Dean’s sister, Jan Westrom, was the warehouse’s general manager. OUR public records, which had been denied to citizens in 2005, had been in the custody of the chairman’s brother and sister. Those who follow issues of election integrity understand the sanctity of chain of custody. Several years earlier, the Hired Truck Scandal, involving the use of hired, private vehicles to do government work, had rocked Democratic Cook County. When the Westrom warehouse issue in Republican DuPage County was brought to the attention of the authorities and the media…crickets chirped.

In August, I drove to Springfield on a 101-degree day to deliver a public statement to the Local Records Commission of Illinois, to request that they alert authorities that the DuPage County Election Commission appeared to be in violation of the law. Letterhead of a state agency has far more impact than a letter from a few, patriotic suburban moms. The Records Commission complied with my request. Alerting the Illinois Attorney General’s office didn’t even require a stamp; a staff member hand-delivered it across the street. The DuPage State’s Attorney’s office was also alerted.

On Sept. 1, 2006, the date before the end of 22-month minimum preservation period for records pertaining to the 2004 general election, Melisa and I presented a cease and desist notice to the Election Commission and sent copies to authorities. We demanded that the destruction stop immediately pending the opinion by the AG’s office. This was purely an exercise in futility; we could almost hear the distant Accurate Document Destruction trucks “mobile document shredding units” en route to the Westrom family’s warehouse.

The DuPage County Election Commission understood something I didn’t — laws which are never enforced can be easily dismissed. It took a lot more to spook them than notification to authorities. The September 12, 2006 minutes of the Election Commission’s board meeting read, “Legal counsel discussed the complaint that the Commission has destroyed records illegally. Legal Counsel recommends that the Commission continue on course…”

Stay the course they did. From the time we first alerted authorities in 2006, to the end of 2007, the Election Commission paid Accurate Document Destruction to dispose of 198 96-gallon toters of material. The Election Commission has refused to disclose the nature of the contents of these toters. Chances are good that you’re not tossing out pizza boxes when hiring a professional shredder.

Finally, on December 26, 2007, IBIP/DuPage Chapter received a belated Christmas gift. Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan published her opinion [PDF] that the DuPage County Election Commission must comply with the Local Records Act for the procedure of destroying OUR public records.

Madigan’s opinion infuriated the Election Commission. “The election commission did nothing wrong from a legal standpoint,” DuPage State’s Attorney Joe “The Corruption Buster” Birkett told the Daily Herald. “In my opinion, it’s case closed.”

Saar stated in a public appearance that he strongly disagreed with Madigan’s opinion, but that the Election Commission would not destroy more of OUR records until the matter was settled either in court or by legislation. Good as the AG’s opinion was, it still wasn’t legally binding.

* * *

Rep. Paul Froehlich had been closely following our battles with the Election Commission and offered support. The Illinois Election Code can only be amended every other year. 2009 was the year to create a law which essentially says: ‘No means no!’

It is fitting to ‘honor’ our election director by calling HB4051 “The Robert T. Saar Act.”

Through it all, the Election Commission board members kept their appointments. The Election Commission’s executive staff kept their positions and received annual raises. This July, Saar is set to become the president of the International Association of Clerks, Recorders, Election Officials & Treasurers (IACREOT). From this saga and numerous other alleged wrongdoings (check the latest…), I’m convinced it would take the jaws of life to pry these guys out of there. Ironically enough, the Election Commission’s large seal still hangs prominently in its office which reads: “Assuring the Consent of the Governed“.

Despite Tuesday’s milestone, there’s still much work to be done to protect OUR public records. OUR future public records may be preserved, yet we still don’t have access to them. Melisa and I jealously monitored the post-election audits conducted by citizens in Ohio which revealed fraud in that state during the 2004 Presidential Election. Such an audit would never be allowed in DuPage County. In addition to the November 2004 poll tapes, we’d like to find out why voter registration fell 84,000 between the primary and general elections in 2004, at a time when voter registration was breaking records nationwide. We’d like to know who had access to the voting machines, software and tabulation room for the November 2004 election, knowing the long, cozy friendships between the Diebold distributor, Fidlar & Co., and the Election Commission.

Bottomline, we’d like to find out why the Election Commission arrogantly chose to err on the side of imprudence, hellbent on destroying OUR public records. After all, we cannot be expected to trust the results of an election, if we cannot trust the process.

We had repeatedly requested that the Election Commission allow a hands-on, comprehensive inventory of OUR public records by the Illinois State Archives. Thanks to former Gov. Rod Blagojevich, suddenly, ethics are cool in Illinois. We’ve caught a tailwind. The Election Commission succumbed to the inventory…sort of…pressured by DuPage County Board Chairman Bob Schillerstrom who plans to run for governor. A field rep was invited to the warehouse for just one day last March. The inventory remains incomplete. Until we see the report, we’ll never know what’s left of OUR records.

But you can bet, we’ll keep trying to find out…

As long promised, The BRAD BLOG has covered your electoral system fiercely and independently, like no other media outlet in the nation. Please support our work with a donation to help us keep going. If you like, we’ll send you some great, award-winning election integrity documentary films in return! Details on that right here…

Share article:

17 Comments on “NO MEANS NO!: Illinois Passes Bill to Force One Single County to Follow the Law

  1. Great work and a great story, but it’s only the beginning. If only every county had such diligent watchdogs of the election process. I’ve been waiting years for some coverage of DuPage at Bradblog and it’s nice to finally see it. Hope their more in the future because there’s more to uncover.

  2. I concur, MarkG8. DuPage has been woefully under-covered here, given the various nightmares in that county, and their unapologetically awful, unlawful, and horrendously partisan election commission.

    I’ll take the blame, as I’m just unable to cover every county every where. So I was very happy that Jean was able to jump in to do the bulk of the heavy lifting for us on this story!

  3. Thanks Jean for such an exhaustive recap of events and for all your hard work over the years. As a resident of DuPage, I appreciate knowing where things stand and who stands for what. Kudos to Paul Froehlich (who is my state rep) for putting his energy into passing a law that to hold the DuPage Election Commission accountable. And thanks to Brad Blog for getting out to a broader audience.

  4. State Rep Paul is the ONLY reason we have HB4051.

    He’s a true hero.

    Speaking of heroes, the Bradster was/is THE voice of election reform. If anyone has any spare change in the couch cushions, please sent it to him. Thanks!

  5. Wow, thanks for giving us the heads up and working so hard. I’m a young voter live in DuPage and have no idea the kind of shenanigans going on…

  6. Oh, Peaches…you ain’t heard the half of it. Unfortunately.

    Hopefully we’ll be able to bring you more info on DuPage in the future. Lord knows there’s plenty…. plenty…As I said, unfortunately.

  7. Thanks to Jean and Melissa… and Paul !!! The candidates can look to a more fair election !

  8. What an incredible story. Where else can you find anything this well researched? In fact, why is it that this isn’t front page news across the state? State Rep Paul Froehlich is the only legislator with real temerity apparently. Kudos to him, and to the writer, and to Brad for providing this forum. Keep us posted. Once the bill is signed by Quinn, where do we go from here to seek justice for years of high jinks in DuPage elections?

  9. Thanks, Terry.

    There are other critical bills pending in the Illinois Assembly which would impact business as usual at the DuPage County Election Commission.

    One bill gives the Illinois AG enforcement power to fight county corruption. Another bill strengthens the Freedom of Information Act in Illinois, which would penalize authorities for not abiding by its provisions.

    We’re hoping that the DuPage State’s Attorney’s office will follow through on a complaint presented to them four months ago:

    http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=264123

    Until then, be the media. Make noise.

    Thanks,

    Jean

  10. Great article. I hope the author will write a follow-up article on the current status of the officials involved in the destruction of records by the DuPage County Election Commission. Judge Jorgensen was appointed an Illinois Appellate Court Justice and is seeking election to a 10 year term on the Illinois Appeals Court. Almost all of the other officials involved are also seeking higher office. As Illinois attempts to dig itself out from under a history of corrrupton, voters have a need to know about officials who were complicit in the destruction of OUR election records.

  11. Bravo for Representitive Paul Froelich for protecting our existing laws, (and bettering them) so there is no ambiguity.
    I do not know how The Local Records Act could be manipulated in the first place BY ANYONE! It’s pretty clear cut.
    Can we make the mandates retro active for all the years they’ve been ignored?

  12. Sherry,

    Thanks for you comments.

    I would have been willing to overlook the 20+ years the Election Commission didn’t comply with the law for the destruction of records. Perhaps they just didn’t know, although other municipal clients of the their attorney had been complying…

    Whatever the lame reason, I would have let it go.

    But I absolutely cannot forgive the Election Commission if they destroyed public records from the time we alerted them of the Local Records Act in January 2006. Any destruction of records from that date on would be in bad faith, at best. Any destruction which took place after we presented the cease and desist notice on Sept. 1, 2006 pending the opinion of the IL AG would be…you decide.

    I want to know what was in those 198 96-gallon toters in 2006 and 2007 picked up by Accurate Document Destruction. If the Election Commission has nothing to hide and believes they were acting lawfully, what is the big secret? Had the Election Commission been in compliance with the Local Records Act, we’d know exactly what was being destroyed.

    I can’t help but wonder if a risk assessment had been conducted? I wonder if the Election Commission decided that it was better to to destroy records, knowing it was unlikely they’d ever be prosecuted, than it would be caught with the smoking gun? Such thoughts occur when there’s no transparency…

    End the secrecy, end the speculation.

  13. Dear Jean and Brad,
    Thank you so much for all of your hard work. It’s a shame that this is not on channels 2,5,7,9 & 11.
    Our media is dead. If this was about Cook, everyone would be screaming.

    Perhaps I did not catch why Paul Froehlich had to sponsor this bill, and work so hard to get it passed. What about the laws that we already had? Those laws were broken. Where are the rest of the Democrats in Illinois? Why are they so quiet? How will we know if the DuPage Election Commission is following the new law? No one but 2 or 3 people in Dupage even pay any attention to counting our votes. It is a tremendous amount of work, and takes millions of dollars to run an election in DuPage. Wouldn’t you think the DuPage Democrats would be hitting the streets over this? After all,
    The election commission is owned and operated by Republicans. Who owns and operates the Democrats in Illinois, and in Dupage?

  14. “Our media is dead.”

    It’s not dead, it just has a different mission then you think, which is state propaganda.

    “Those laws were broken.”

    Yes, but if you are IN the system you are treated much differently then if you are not IN.

    Brad and associates, THANK YOU FOR THE HEROIC WORK!

  15. Dear Robert Ken,
    I know very well what the media’s mission is, and it is NOT “our”, “We The People’s” media. The media is, at least, 50% responsible for what is happening in this country, let alone DuPage.

    As far as the “system”, in Illinois, there isn’t one. That is how the cheaters get to manipulate our election codes.

    Still, where are the DuPage Dems? What is Lisa Madigan doing to protect us from vote stealing?
    Maybe, if we could put on a circus in DuPage, the media would show Saar and Berkette frog marching.

  16. The DuPage County Election Commission and its attorney conveinently think of the Illinois Election Code as the Constitution. They claim it supersedes other laws including the Local Records Act and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

    If the Local Records Act had been enforced, there would have been no need for HB 4051. In fact, while in Springfield recently, a high-ranking official scoffed that the bill wasn’t necessary because the existing law was quite clear. True, but things are different in DuPage County. As I said, HB 4051 was necessary overkill.

    Another concern we brought to authorities regarding the Election Commission was their non-compliance with FOIA. I knew we weren’t going to get anywhere when as assistant state’s attorney in DuPage County when she said that FOIA was a federal law, not a state law, so it wasn’t a concern of their office. FOIA is both a federal and state law. I knew then it was time to pack up. FOIA has been recently fortified by the Illinois Assembly, thank goodness.

    Now that records are allegedly being preserved (we’ve never been presented evidence), we must work on obtaining access to them.

    We need a catch-all law which essentially states: The Illinois Election Code does not supersede other laws you don’t feel like following.

    Where are ALL the political parties when it comes to election integrity? As Brad Friedman says, this isn’t a matter of right or left — it’s a matter of right and wrong.

  17. “Where are ALL the political parties when it comes to election integrity? As Brad Friedman says, this isn’t a matter of right or left — it’s a matter of right and wrong.”

    Thank you Jean for your very thoughtful answer.
    I guess this means that we should all support candidates who are from a party that will take a stance on election integrity. If the 2 parties cannot take a stand on “right or wrong” for the very people who are voting for them, then they do not deserve our so called votes. So, this means we will not have a democracy, after all.

    A lone candidate, from either party can mutter the words of supporting election integrity, but if his or her party does not make election integrity part of their party platform, then we will never see a true change for the votes to really count. We need every official, from all sides on board, to have democracy, especially the Democrats. You would think they learned their lesson after 2000 and 2004, but I really don’t think they care.

    This issue should precede all other issues, because our votes are where it all begins and ends.

Comments are closed.

Please help The BRAD BLOG, BradCast and Green News Report remain independent and 100% reader and listener supported in our 22nd YEAR!!!
ONE TIME
any amount...

MONTHLY
any amount...

OR VIA SNAIL MAIL
Make check out to...
Brad Friedman/
BRAD BLOG
7095 Hollywood Blvd., #594
Los Angeles, CA 90028

RECENT POSTSX

About Brad Friedman...

Brad is an independent investigative journalist, blogger and broadcaster.
Full Bio & Testimonials…
Media Appearance Archive…
Articles & Editorials Elsewhere…
Contact…
He has contributed chapters to these books…
…And is featured in these documentary films…

BRAD BLOG ON THE AIR!

THE BRADCAST on KPFK/Pacifica Radio Network (90.7FM Los Angeles, 98.7FM Santa Barbara, 93.7FM N. San Diego and nationally on many other affiliate stations! ALSO VIA PODCAST: RSS/XML feed | Pandora | TuneInApple Podcasts/iTunesiHeartAmazon Music

GREEN NEWS REPORT, nationally syndicated, with new episodes on Tuesday and Thursday. ALSO VIA PODCAST: RSS/XML feed | Pandora | TuneInApple Podcasts/iTunesiHeartAmazon Music

Media Appearance Archives…

AD
CONTENT

ADDITIONAL STUFF

Brad Friedman/
The BRAD BLOG Named...

Buzz Flash's 'Wings of Justice' Honoree
Project Censored 2010 Award Recipient
The 2008 Weblog Awards